r/policydebate•
OneOffCapK

Pfers rly think they are doing something 🤡🤡🤡

Pfers rly think they are doing something 🤡🤡🤡

Posted Jan 13, 2021, 12:46 AM UTC

6214
mjychabaud22•

Don’t worry, I’m a pfer, I’ll vote for the Russia topic as soon as I remember my log in to NSDA.

10
OneOffCapKOPThe order is going to be zero off dedev•

Literal goat tysm

4
Bonjour_Chez•

What water topic *confused*

5
OneOffCapKOPThe order is going to be zero off dedev•

Some pfers are voting for a shitty water topic for policy debate because they have nothing better to do thus potentially leaving policy with a bad topic for next year

16
Calithrix•

What is the wording?

2
Bonjour_Chez•

Wait how do u vote for a policy topic if your a pf'er

1
MayoIsSpicy6699420•

If you have an NSDA account you can vote

1
Bonjour_Chez•

wait that's broken, its like democrats voting in a republican primary

1
Tom_ButterNubsKick Aff, Take Negs•

Gang gang water topic would be so fun tho, like unironically I voted for it and I do exclusively policy

-3
OneOffCapKOPThe order is going to be zero off dedev•

Have fun running fism as the only da next year

2
Tom_ButterNubsKick Aff, Take Negs•

Food for though food for thought: think about it a little longer and realize there are way more das and neg positions than fism. Like, I'm not here for a giant fight of throwing insults back and forth; I just genuinely think it would be interesting and fun to debate. And I mean both sides when I say that, not just Aff as many are hasty to point out.

0
OneOffCapKOPThe order is going to be zero off dedev•

Ive put some thought into it. I feel like it is an interesting topic but not one that is conducive to a year long debate. Its basically cjr without ptx links. Viable disads are spending, fism, ptx, and corporate backlash. But those are basically terminally thumped. Spending has been going up year after year and fism has been eroiding. Leaving basically ptx as the only ground. With dem controlled house and senate rly the only ptx is going to be horsetrading which is rly bad. Sure their might be good disads for certain affs but that isnt sufficient to justify a whole resolution. Russia on the other hand has every aff link to alliances, un, china, and appeasement meaning debates will be more balanced rather then water where one side reads we should stop polluting water and the other side has nothing to say. This is just my opinion tho, i respect you voting for water cuz u like the resolution

3
[deleted]•

[deleted]

-8
PotatoMan777heg solves vtl •

mad cuz pfer

12
drproteinpowderx100 time TOC Champ •

lol he deleted comment because PFer clown , get to writing that clown college application Mr. PF Debater

3
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1