Currently have positions in AMP, zero in NANO.
This is a genuine question as they're both seemingly very similar. Or could somebody clear that up?
Just wondering how/why AMP ever succeeds when NANO already exists and seems much more widely popular?
Posted Feb 17, 2021, 7:14 PM UTC
Flexa/AMP has the potential to be the freeway that all crypto used as currency can transact on.
Because of the Flexa network being used by many companies already is why its more popular and successful.
Bc we like AMP
Nano isnt popular..lmfao. they hired an instragram thot as COO. They have zero connections to the credit card industry
Literally nano investors are a massive cult and every week they post garbage about connections to mastercard only to get refuted and nothing ever happens.
The project is a joke and an example of what not to do
Lol I went on their subreddit, saw a post about a mastercard partnership so I decided to to spread the word about flexa/amp.
I was downvoted :(
Honestly don't know much about Nano so anyone can correct me if I'm wrong, but Nano is moreso focused on being a lightweight cryptocurrency that is used directly for payments. In a (Nano) perfect world, everyone would accept Nano and be able to receive Nano.
Where Flexa shines is in its interoperability between various cryptocurrencies and fiat. With Flexa, you can theoretically send/receive payment in any crypto or fiat. That's not to say Nano isn't a great project, I simply don't see it as a direct competitor.