How many of you feel you would be prepared to take part in full-scale, violent revolution?
Not wondering whether it's "right" or "would change anything", just wondering how many actually feel that they just about could.
Posted Oct 29, 2011, 7:13 PM UTC
I think most people (Americans) who would say yes to this are probably kidding themselves.
Why do you think that? Just curious, really. I think most people who were/are partaking in the current Middle Eastern revolutions felt that they would under no circumstance do it either, until it actually began. Are you/we (americans/westerners) different, too docile?
Revolutions are spawned by truly dire circumstances, abject poverty, desperation and such. The spoiled and pampered citizens of the US are nowhere near that point. Sure we'd revolt, but only until it was time for our coffee break at Starbucks or our favorite TV show came on.
I don't live in the US, but it seems that a pretty large portion of your population isn't spoiled or pampered, at least not anymore. The reason I'm asking is because I feel that the global political and economical situation has many similarities to the conditions the world was in just before WW2, and that we may just stand on the brink of either revolution, war, or both. Trying to gauge what direction it's leaning towards.
They most definitely are spoiled and pampered. My father grew up during the great depression, the poverty he experienced quite literally molded his life. The present circumstances in the US pale by comparison.
I disagree that dire circumstances are necessary. I think the key is popular anger that is harnessed by a capable leader. My main concern would be that our ability to own weapons has been so limited that the military/national guard/police could easily slaughter the people that revolt.
[deleted]
We've got it too easy. Our situations are not anywhere near as bad as we make them out to be. We will give up in the face of adversity.