What a Tinder match a 700 ELO looks like
Posted Mar 24, 2021, 1:36 AM UTC
86159
You may need to find a better training AI. This one misses lots of blunders.
163
My engine evaluates assuming optimal play from the other side, unfortunately at 700 ELO there isn't a lot of optimal play.
61
Her opening game is weak
73
I wouldn't even play my rooks just to avoid trading them with her.
2
a very passive approach from black here, really trying to stifle white's approach
43
why go on dating apps if you’re gonna add this little to a conversation? just ignore or say you’re uninterested, it’s so easy
28
Yeah
5
Lmao
9
[removed]
8
Funny how White's last mistake us actuallu a brilliant move but the analysis board was probably at a very liw depth.
4
Should Have Been brilliant move The last one
3
Is it just me or that opener is actually pretty good?
2
What would be the bongcloud equivalent?
1
God I hate how little she adds to the conversation
Huh?
GOD I HATE HOW LITTLE SHE ADDS TO THE CONVERSATION
Okay
Got an axe?
Typical woman
Bobby has a course on women
And the Jews
Jewish women🥵
Double whammy
And mommy, in his case.
"Bobby and the Jews" is the name of my new band
"Oh, Spassky oh Karpy, have you seen the news? Oh but they're so grungy..."
"B-B-B-Bobby and the Jews"
Does it remind you of how girls talk to you when you try to chat them up?
Huh ?
This is pretty much 90% of my Tinder matches. Like talking to a brick wall. Like, I get some people aren't good at chatting, but why tf are you on a chatting app if you suck at it?
Because it's a fucking app, not a chatting app.
You need to chat to fuck. Can't mate without an opening.
Wow I have a new LinkedIn heading. Thanks!
That's actually some modern propaganda, you can play good chess without knowing opening theory
[deleted]
Average girl on tinder has a lot more matches than average dude, that's just how these things shake out. Probably she's got five or six other dudes messaging her, so why should she spend that much effort on the ones she's not most interested in? On tinder if you're just trying to hook up you usually have to settle as a dude, if you're looking for something serious it's different, but chicks just looking for a hookup can almost find someone hotter than them to give them some dick.
Also this dude and this chick are just not on the same level. She doesn't get the joke so why should she get engaged in the conversation? The dude should just acknowledge that she's not his type and move on. And sending messages about axes on tinder is very far from advised lol...
To me it's like yeah this chick is dumb but she's not being rude, if anything the dude is being weird and rude to keep messing with her honestly.
Your logic has several holes but I'll address each one.
This is neither here nor there. In order to get a match on Tinder both people need to swipe. If you're swiping on people you're not really interested in just to stockpile matches that's on you.
Again, see last point. Just don't swipe on people you're not interested in. Also, I'd argue that being a dry wall is worse than not replying at all. Or hell, you can just unmatch people if you really feel that way and save everyone the trouble. The reality is that many people act like this even towards people they are interested in, because they're lazy and just suck at conversation. Which brings us back to my original point: if you suck at conversing, don't go on a chatting app, you're just aggravating everyone.
The fact that your take is that the dude is being rude makes me think that you're the type of person to be dry as a stale tuna sandwich and expect other people to do the conversational heavy lifting when talking to you.
I generally agree, except for the part that you need to be good at conversing when you're on Tinder. Even if you suck at it you can try to talk to people, and if you don't well than you'll never learn. You can't expect everyone you write to on Tinder to be great at small talk.
...ok let me try to make this simple...
What if you swipe on ten people who you think you'd be interested in and you match all of them in 24 hours... are you really going to text and follow through with all of them, or are you going to focus on the one's you're most interested in? Believe it or not some people do real things in their real lives and don't have infinite time to text twenty people back and forth all day...
You'd sort of have a point if people knew in advance who they would match with, but they don't. So you swipe on a bunch of people to start with, because you don't know if you are or aren't going to match the ones you like the most, then you get some matches, then you focus on some, and you keep some as backups. Nothing wrong with it.
Honestly it's just funny, your perspective. It's that immature toxic male sense of entitlement, like just because you match someone they owe you anything. Matching is like step 1 out of 10 before someone is actually going to meet up with you, and having matches who never message you back is just part of how Tinder works. Life isn't easy. Grow up dawg.
Do you see this as a good opening?
It's a book move so it has been tried and tested
So is the Orangutan opening and the Sodium attack.
ayyy
Hey, you wouldn't expect a deer to just lie down for you when you're hunting amirite
Welcome to Tinder!
I feel most of the people on there are just doing it as a confidence boost
The more people that match with them the better they feel
I agree, but it's a pretty shitty situation all around. Tinder is a really flawed system for several reasons.
So first of all, most guys are looking to hook up ASAP, and most women are not. This creates a really unpleasant asymmetrical situation: men swipe on a large number of women, and women either swipe on very few men or are quickly overwhelmed with conversations.
If women are extremely picky, they'll likely have better conversations, but the problem is that, due to the gender imbalance on tinder, women tend to be less attractive than their male matches. As a result, the guys that these women do meet will usually just go for a casual relationship or a one night stand, since they intuitively know that they're more attractive. So I suspect that this is why women tend to complain about dating apps being filled with fuck boys who don't treat them right, blah blah blah. I realize I'm running the risk of coming off like an incel but I don't really care because we all know it's true.
The other option is that women aren't extremely picky. In this case, it's basically impossible for them to carry on a clever conversation, because they'd be juggling a million simultaneously. But regardless, I think that many women don't really think about these factors, so they get an inflated ego, which is honestly understandable. Wow, they think; I threw a few random pictures on Tinder and now I get 100+ likes a day. I knew I was special! So I deserve the best.
It's easy for ladies to be extremely lazy in conversations, because why the fuck not? De facto, it's the man's job to lead the way, impress her, and drive the conversation towards mutual interest and a meet up.
All of this is to say that Tinder basically exposes the worst of humanity (in both men and women) and it's pretty difficult to fix its problems. If you meet someone you click with on Tinder, consider yourself extremely lucky
Yeah I would say that is why Christian Mingle might be the best cause I would assume the guys aren't looking ti hook up
It's actually because women are evil narcissists but I can see how you'd make that mistake