[DD] Why the GME dream to have retail to fundamentally control the price is wrong.
Saw a bunch of comments over at r/WSB that "WE CONTROL THE PRICE." If we say it's worth $100,000 then it is! This is misguided and I wrote up a response:
You're sort of right. Yes in theory the market could collectively decide that GME is worth $1M a share and if every owner of a share banded together and could enforce this price, a cartel on GME shares would be formed.
There's a problem with this though, first one is what actually could happen if the cartel succeeds but I'll get to that later. This requires a mechanism to enforce discipline on every single holder of GME. Right now traders can buy dips, pretend to be on the train then sell, rinse and repeat, dip and rip.
You might ask, what if the true diamond handers NEVER sell? Then eventually the question arises, when to jump off? At some point you must take a profit right? But as soon as people believe that people are jumping off, no one wants to buy it. So no one wants to be the bagholder. Since market participants are forward looking some people will sell before this event. It's a catch 22, in order to horde shares you can't sell. But to make money you have to sell at some point.
Another problem is how GME executives are likely to act when the shares become $1M or whatever you want it to be. They can issue shares because capital is basically free. They already announced this in the 10K
Since January 2021, we have been evaluating whether to increase the size of the ATM (at-the-market) Program and whether to potentially sell shares of our Class A Common Stock under the increased ATM Program during the course of fiscal 2021, primarily to fund the acceleration of our future transformation initiatives and general working capital needs.
Can you blame them? If the stock price becomes stupidly high, that's just free capital for bonus / comping high talent new hires, transforming the company towards e-commerce, etc. This creates new shares that requires the cartel to keep buying.
Posted Mar 26, 2021, 6:43 PM UTC
Also in that same document that people continually conveniently forget to broadcast because it doesn’t suit their narrative
Based on our current operating plans, we believe that available cash balances, cash generated from our operating activities and net availability under our revolving credit facility will provide sufficient liquidity to fund our operations for the next 12 months as well as the foreseeable future.
I honestly don’t think the majority of people in GME think they control the price - it’s clearly bigger players than us fighting it out at this point.
As for 1 million a share - up front I don’t believe it’ll ever get that high, but they’re not saying EVERYONE will get that. If they (the shorts covering) have to fulfil orders at a rapid pace when they finally concede, is there a chance some people with ridiculously high sell limits will win big? Absolutely. Tho maybe not that big haha
It's saying that there's enough cash to support existing operations, that is a statement of liquidity.
A company transformation is expensive. And the more capital you have, the easier it is.
For sure. But also if they sabotage the squeeze they’ll have several million boycotters. I really hope they aren’t stupid. If they can benefit too and there’s enough to go around? Power to the players
The people who are YOLO'ing on this don't care. Those who want to be long-term holders want them to take advantage of free capital. It reduces their risk and lets them indirectly capture the craze without selling.
With respect this is just wrong. "Long term holders want them to take advantage of free capital"
You're literally saying that investors are happy with losing hundreds of thousands of dollars when the price tanks on an offering.
If GameStop screws over retail investors and saves hedge funds by doing an offering, then they will go out of business quickly as they will lose support of most retail investors (Myself will be one of them)
I don’t think either of us can comment on what every individual believes or wants. Though I would hazard a guess and say 99.999% of investors are looking forward to a squeeze