Is ranking up in 1v1 harder than in 2s/3s?

1s is typically a higher scoring game than others so you tend to have more obvious wins/losses.

I think most people have lower ranks in 1s than others, i am the same rank in 2s and 1s but I still say that I am a better 1s player because it is harder.

1s and 2s play very differently, your rotations are very different between the two and so if you are a rotstional player in 2s, you will have worse rotations in 1s. Mechanics are pretty transfersble between thr game modes though and so some people may need less time to reach the same rank in 1s as 2s

Yeah It's normal to have a lower 1v1 rank than 2s/3s. I'm a Diamond 3 in 2s and a Plat 3 in 1s

Yeah, its a bit harder. It requires a different playstyle that some will adapt to easily while others, not so much. In gold you should really be focusing on fundamentals(aerials, ground shots, dribbling) I'm champ 3 in 2's, but champ 1 in 1's, so its completely normal.

[deleted]

Watch this series from Flakes: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLaVDH5Sevbtpa0IbW3W2HTyZ9uJNLSYhR

they are different games entirely.

1s will have you playing totally different than 2s, and 2s will have you playing completely different than 3s.

in 1s you see almost no wall play, rotations only require 1 person. you arent building counter attacks with a teammate, no comms, no passing, no visualizing where everyone is on the field, etc. (if you can call it "rotations" at that point lol)

in 2s your rotations and your positioning only revolve around one person. you are keeping an eye on spacing with your teammate, you are trying to maintain pressure on the offense and relieve pressure on the defense.

in 3s, you have two other people your play needs to be around. you gotta move quick in rotations and you have to know where everybody is on the field. completely differnet game than 1s.

You're playing a game mode that you haven't played before. You can't reasonably expect to be the same rank as other modes. If you exclusively played 1s from the start and then started playing 3s, you'd probably be much lower in 3s.

As far as the distribution is concerned, though, while 1s used to be harder to get to higher ranks in, that's no longer the case. In fact, 1s is now statistically the easiest of the standard modes to rank up in.

[deleted]

Yes, there is just a straight up MMR difference, so your rank will likely be lower even if you are placed at your skill-level's rank.

The bigger issue: 1s will actually force you how to think about this game correctly. Your poor decisions will be punished with a goal by anyone competent. The supersonic-platinum boom ball gameplay will be punished with a goal every time you get a hard touch for no reason. Your silly powerless flicks will be saved and countered into your net. Your ape-challenges will be faked or adapted to.

Most people avoid 1s because of this. It very, very quickly shows people that they are bad. If you can embrace this with a healthy mindset, it is by far the fastest way to get better at the game-sense side of Rocket League.

[removed]

1s more strongly reflects your skill level, 2s and 3s are more likely to bail you out of you’re having a bad game.

I honestly think 1s is easier. I’m diamond 2 in 1s and diamond one in 2/3s. Usually I get pisspoor teammates that hurt me more than they help so I think ones is easier to rank up and see your true skill. Also makes you better at the game