Gunman Faced Disciplinary Hearing on Day of San Jose Attack
nbcbayarea.com/investigations/gunman-faced-vt...Posted May 28, 2021, 11:54 PM UTC
Posted May 28, 2021, 11:54 PM UTC
I think this is where the confusion about a “union meeting” came from. He was probably entitled to union representation in this disciplinary meeting (and explains why the union rep was present at 6am whom the shooter reportedly told “I’m not going to shoot you”.)
He was the subject of a Skelly hearing which signals disciplinary action where he could have been fired, lost pay, and/or demoted. Must have been pretty serious.
That almost always means firing in my experience.
It also suggests a motive.
Who cares. It's so fascinating to me that people desperately want to immortalize pieces of shit like this by talking about them constantly. Are you going to make a thread about how the mass murderer liked to wear socks? When's the biopic coming out?
These types of people deserve to be memory-holed, banished from history for all time, expunged from the record. Nothing is gained by hyper focusing on their lives leading up to their horrific actions.
How do we prevent these things from happening again in the future if we don’t try to understand the motivations of the perpetrators?
The intelligence agency
It’s disappointing they didn’t do anything about it then
They saw that he was a middle-aged white dude, so they thanked him for his time and let him go.
Wow that flagrant racism. What is wrong with you?
Middle aged white men are never accused of terrorism, just mental health issues. Terrorism is already a racial term
[removed]
Realistically, what could they do without violating his civil rights? He hadn't committed any crimes at that point in time yet. Maybe you add him to a list but I'm not sure that would have stopped him.