When it comes to tech, planned obsolescence is a good thing.
I think tech moves so fast, I prefer for companies to try and make products with newer featured on a more frequent cycles, even if they aren’t meant to last as long. Even if my phone could last 10 years I wouldn’t want to use it more than 4. How many of you would still be using your Motorola razor if it still worked?
Edit: My point is that more frequent cycles leads to more rapid innovation. I like innovation. I used the word planned obsolescence because this is r/unpopularopinions and I was trying to be unpopular. I’m not against products lasting longer (I don’t want my washing machine to break every 2 years).
Edit 2: Well, I posted here knowing it was an unpopular one. Did I win?
Posted Jul 1, 2021, 12:04 AM UTC · edited
013