Carlos Castaneda and Chaos Magick
Guys and gals, just started reading Liber Null. So much of it is cribbed from Carlos Castaneda, I am surprised. I fucking love it because I feel like I get it already; already shut off the internal dialog (long ago) and have a quiet mind. Already can project intentions into dreams, and already I am detached from results and laugh at everything because of Don Juan’s teachings. I seriously think you all should read some Carlos Castaneda if you haven’t. So many parallels with “sorcery” and chaos magic.
It’s key that laughter is a tool to cement intentions. This is to negate the indulgences and wishes. The universe is a cosmic joke, and we are the punch line. Remember to laugh folks.
Let’s keep it interesting. Tell me what sources of knowledge you have tapped into that clicked immediately with Liber Null when you first read it. I think it’s fascinating that the book really does pull from so many places accurately. The understanding is there.
Posted Aug 29, 2021, 7:11 AM UTC · edited
I have a mixed relationship with Castaneda. Some of his work really resonated with me, but he’s a shady figure. It’s one of those truths mixed with a bunch of nonfiction. He basically created a cult of women followers and became addicted to attention from celebrities. He’s a fascinating figure, just needs to be approached with extreme skepticism
CC's work is a recipe book. Nothing more. Try the recipes. No need to delve into the author's personal history. It's not your business. Your business is improving. If the recipes help, great. But if you haven't tried the recipes your review is worthless. It's really that simple.
Edit: And I just have to add that it's very funny to hear anyone cautioning skepticism to Chaotes!
Have you not noticed we are just as apt to incorporate Superman or the Nina Turtles into their magic as they are to incorporate Castaneda, Jesus or John frikkin Lennon?
We were way past suspension of disbelief as soon as we started entertaining the concept of magic. Forget skepticism!
In chaos magic skepticism will never be your ally.
in chaos magic generalizations are not your teacher. every practitioner has at least a right if not responsibility to inform themselves on the ideas and philosophies of anyone instructing others in the use of magic, if only to verify the ethics involved in the instruction
Fair. But this is not that.
This is someone who is not informed telling people who are informed that remaining uninformed is better or safer than finding out for yourself. That because he doesn't know you shouldn't either. That's nonsense.
I am saying what you're saying.
Look into it. Try it. Find out first hand! Don't believe armchair deniers who haven't even read all the books, much less attempted the work!
Contempt prior to investigation is more than useless. It's actively counterproductive.
And those who practice it really shouldn't be offering advice. That too is an ethics issue.
As a skeptical person i feel i obtained a more succinct understanding of your position just by positing the original counterargument and reading your response.
as a magician, im tempted to remind you of the potential in any codified instruction to instill subconscious habits and behaviors to produce preferential results, especially in regards to interactions with other people. as OP stated, real powers are rare. its not ridiculous to say however that those who actively seek to produce magick in the world without proper attainment and/or observation can fall victim to the same errs in judgement and subsequent ethical mistakes, not only in their lives but in the impact their spirit has on the world. just like the coward who becomes a bully out of fear and insecurity, it's not hard to imagine that one can influence the minds and realities of others through occult means.
that being said, you're right. i can't say if the author in question is a nefarious black magician intent on creating a sex cult or anything like that until i actually read his work (in my opinion at least) and see how it influences others of like mind, circumstance, etc.
however you're incorrect in assuming it's unhelpful to voice skepticism in a conversation about the work of a practitioner of any kind of magic. the inquisitive mind grows through such discussion.