Smoking Gun Proof From NASA Software Engineers That Mars Rovers Are On Earth — Not On Mars
christiansfortruth.com/smoking-gun-proof-from...
christiansfortruth.comPosted Sep 7, 2021, 3:34 PM UTC
930
christiansfortruth.comSome good technical posturing going on at JPL - goes with what the whistleblowers have said about the place.
However, FTL comm (and travel) has also been revealed by other whistleblowers from the black world. I would surmise this is more likely than the rovers being on earth.
The rover data is being scrubbed for signs of past advanced civilizations on Mars - that has also been disclosed by others.
4
Any links? Particularly on jpl topic? Seems interesting
2
JPL - I dont recall off hand - it was a while back. Posted in a conspiracy forum or a YT channel.
Several former contractors came forward with strange stories and weird behaviour for the lab - something like the rovers being classified at many levels even though their hardware was mostly COTS - raw data being handled by a team of spooks. As in, they were obviously worried about the raw data being released without redactions.
But the FTL stuff, you can search for that on the various discussion groups. I know some of Dr. Greers team (disclosure project, etc.).
Obviously, dont bother with WIKI .... haha
1
Does this website group believe earth is only 6,000 yrs old though?
3
Closer to 8000
-1
“Christians for Truth” omg the absolute irony in that name hahahhaha
2†
Unlike Reddit Atheism. Who holds Scientific Truth* as gospel right?
*As dictated by International Science Organizations
10
[removed]
1
i thought so at first too - but tis article has some merit. Same as "christian science monitor" - they have the occasional piece of outstanding journalism.
2†
[removed]
1
[removed]
1
What’s the irony?
0
your comment is unbelievable ignorant and I'm just letting you know that this comment is stupid.
Please don't reply to me because i'm not interested in what you have to say.
good day.
-12
Lol
3
[removed]
1
###[Meta] Sticky Comment
Rule 2 does not apply when replying to this stickied comment.
Rule 2 does apply throughout the rest of this thread.
What this means: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain only.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
Aside from the obvious issues with the source site here, they are quoting an anonymous post from some blog. Doesn't give me a whole lot of confidence that any of this is real
1
Okay, so what it boils down to is that the time stamps on the images match when they were taken by the rover. I'm not a software engineer, but there could be all sorts of reasons why this might be, outside of the rover actually being on earth. Also, the author of that essay couldn't even be arsed rereading it before it was published to pick out all the extra/missing words and appalling grammar, so I highly doubt they put the time in to do any significant research outside of the interview they were writing about. Bearing in mind the website is called "Christiansfortruth", they're probably biased and cherry picking.
1
We're not allowed to go to Mars or back to the Moon. Or at least NASA isn't.
1
haha christiansfortruth.com what a coincidence
0†
What does Christianity have to do with Mars or NASA.
0†
Sometimes it feels like a time travel to watch this sub, geoengineering and haarp, fake moon and fake space, fake states and fake elections, and then there is this sub, still struggling with basic knowledge like that, plus the bandwaggon shills that make it even worse.
This subs state is clueless at that point.
Stuff has been proven for decades, people here still act if it's just theories, disgusting to watch stupidity unfold that shameless.
0†
[removed]
1
[removed]
1
Anything posted by ChristiansForTruth is by definition not “smoking gun proof”
-1†
First problem is assuming anything, even that the speed of light is a thing. Boo
-2†
This article is from a religious website. It carries zero credibility. 0/10.
-3†
And it's quoting some guy, who is quoting some anonymous guy who posted something on a blog.
Can credibility go into the negative numbers?
2
[removed]
1
SS: I have no opinion on this, but this definitely belongs to this sub. What do you think ? Has the Mars rover ever hit the Martian soil ? Or is the Mars rover a money laundering scheme accompanied with a robot worth a couple thousand dollars, rolling in the Sahara desert, here on good ol' planet Earth ?
For $52,000,000 a day, I'm going with money laundering.
[removed]