This sounds familiar. Although pedophiles don't appear to be a concern in this case.
techweekeurope.co.uk/news/uk-government-to-de...
techweekeurope.co.ukPosted Feb 20, 2012, 10:57 PM UTC
53
techweekeurope.co.uktechweekeurope.co.uktechweekeurope.co.ukPosted Feb 20, 2012, 10:57 PM UTC
Uninformative headline from OP.
Downvote.
You're extending your pursuit of editorialized headlines to "uninformative" ones now? Pretty soon I expect you will complain about "flowery" headlines, or "irritating" headlines, or "literary" headlines.
Do you have anything useful to say on the actual topic of the post?
No, it's an entirely different reason for downvoting. Don't be silly Ferdinand.
Editorialized headline's aren't good.
Uninformative headlines are also not good, but for entirely different reasons. A fascinating link posted with the headline "stuff" or "ABCDE" is not helpful. But that has nothing to do with editorializing.
If you'd like another example, if someone posted something fascinating about the adoption of the Android operating system by schools in Brazil, I'd downvote it as well because it would be in the wrong sub-reddit. That has nothing to do with how informative or how editorialized the headline might be.
If a link is contributing to r/canada's discussions, that's a great reason for an upvote. An informative headline is a good contribution.