It's the Blackfyre Rebellion. Whose side are you on?
Bloodraven and Blackfyre are possibly the most awesome characters in the series. I just can't seem to decide whose side I would pick.
Whose side are you on and why?
Posted Feb 23, 2012, 2:45 PM UTC
Daeron was seen as weak. Daemon's claim to the throne came from the facts that his father not only legitimized him and his brothers (and sisters?) but also that he gave him the family sword "Blackfyre" which was interpreted as a confirmation of the rumor that Aegon IV suspected Daeron was not actually his son, and intended to pass the throne to Daemon.
Considering the presumed weakness of Daeron, the rumors, and the gift given to Daemon it'd be easy to come to the conclusion that the black dragon is the better choice. Aegon V, however, quotes his namesake, saying something along the lines of "the sword was not the kingdom."
I think I'd have to stick with the Red Dragon during the first Blackfyre rebellion.
EDIT for sentence structure. Also, I'd have probably sided with the Crown out of fear for Bloodraven and his "thousand eyes, and one." That seems to have been the general consensus to me, even amongst those who sided with the Blackfyres.
During the brief second Blackfyre uprising, I'd have almost certainly not have wasted my time.
Is most of this history held in the Dunk & Egg books? I've skimmed some of the Targaryen history.. but not this much.
It's discussed a lot in the D&E series. I highly recommend them if you haven't read them yet.
I highly, highly recommend them. Is it a crime to say that I'm actually looking forward to the fourth installment of D&E more than tWoW?
I am too. I love dunk.
Seriously, I highly, highly, highly recommend the stories.
I think Daemon would have left a better legacy than Daeron.
That's not to say I'm ignorant of Daeron's (Marrying Daenerys to a prince of Dorne and creating the watergardens/etc)
Also, Daemon was apparently the best sword who ever lived (fought like the warrior himself).
I don't know about that. In times of war, swordsmanship matters. But in times of peace, the great warriors rarely prove to be good rulers. Take Robert, for example. Great warrior, won the throne and then... let the kingdom slip from him because he couldn't be bothered with small problems like "counting coppers" and such.
The kingdom never really 'slipped' from him, did it?
Cersei was the problem since day one, Varys told Ned that he had done everything in his power to keep Robert alive throughout the years and protect him from his enemies.
In the end, nobody could save Robert from himself and while he left the coffers empty -- when he died it wasn't like the kingdom was hurting for gold or not paying their debts (The crown just borrowed gold from the lannisters/etc).
Daemon Blackfyre was said to be charming, intelligent and the sort of man that won friends easily. Think of Daemon as a sort of 'mega' Jaime Lannister.
Um, yes it was. Cersei's decision to solve the crown's financial crunch by just not paying Braavos may have been dazzlingly moronic, but it was a dazzlingly moronic response to a real problem that the kingdom was facing.
the kingdom did slip from him because he sold it to the lannisters
Yes but Bloodraven even before becoming a tree was like a mix of Varys (spies), Littlefinger (cunning), Tywin (ruthlessness) and Crow's Eye (pet sorcerers). It's hard to go up against someone like that.