Source
NaughtyBlackGuy•

I’m feminine AF and I barley touch my self…when will people stop generalizing?

16
LawyerfromSPNo, really, how do they work? :snoo_thoughtful:•

to further your point, I'd like to add that I touch myself on a regular basis and I can say with confidence I'm what anyone would call masculine

3
MediciButForErotica•

Why do people feel the need to just suddenly become experts in biology? Like I would never have the confidence to say insane shit like this because I have a high school level of understanding of biology and don’t see it going much further.

9
The_Book-JDPIt’s a boneless meat stick not a magic wand.•

They figure if they throw in a bunch of big words (which I’ll bet they think scientists do, they think scientists don’t actually know what they are talking about so… …big words) no one will question them. When people do question them, they get all angry and defensive and just start attacking before storming off like a toddler.

3
AtlanticDuck•

What te fuck did I just read?

I have slight above average testosterone levels (tested like a year ago, long story) and proud of my femenine traits. Also I never liked most representations of what is to be masculine :I

5
SykoSarah•

Once again, biological baloney defeated entirely by the existence and prevalence of condoms (referring to the last comment).

That is to say, even if it wasn't painfully stupid and had some scientific merit, all you'd need to do in order to avoid it is wrap your willy.

4
Ravennis•

I really would like to know how people come up with these "scientific" explanations, to see the steps behind how they get to these conclusions.

3
Matthewhalo17•

Fellas is it gay to have teh seccsee with a womans?

2
EatLard•

No way that account is actually a woman.

1
This_Seal•

Maybe I'm stretching a bit far, but the black cat and crystal ball next to her username make me guess this is someone obsessed with "witchy alternative" bullshit. She probably also believes in zodiac signs, healing crystals and auras. Its just the next step in the stairwell of nonesense. If you already have a dispossition to believe in non-scientific claims, you are more likely to fall for the next claim, that isn't backed up by any science.

3
[deleted]•

[deleted]

1
MTHINRIX666•

Ok, so technically, kinda true, but also not in any way more advance than saying if you don't jack off for about a day or two, compared to someone who does it, for instance, twice a day every day, the semen will be more thick and come out in few stands or shots. I am unsure fully as to why, but have to assume something both built up inside the body and the actual action has some amount of damage or stress on the actual tubes that perform such a function and it can't be done to the same effectiveness each time in succession.

But honestly, I would assume what kind you want is pretty preferential. If you're like, into the visuals of ejaculate and it sticking to you or for it being inside any of organ that's not your mouth, you'd probably want a little more time in-between the cumming and goings. If you're into shots, you want someone who is a little drained already, as someone who cums multiple times in a day will tell ya, it becomes less and less viscous each time and is easier to shoot out at higher speeds due to the lack of weight. You also get more distant and more liquid, as it's basically coagulated water the more and more one ejaculates compared to the more paste-esq substant of someone who is a bit more pent up.

My source is well. I have a penis and have done some testing for science. I need my research to be peer-review but I have faith in my findings.

0