help in understanding this report.
greatplainslaboratory.com/articles-1/2015/11/...Posted Apr 8, 2022, 12:40 PM UTC
Posted Apr 8, 2022, 12:40 PM UTC
One complicating factor in evaluating this study is that it repeatedly recommends tests that are sold by the company that did the research. That is a big red flag.
Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are now allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will continue to be removed and our normal comment rules still apply to other comments.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
I feel like the report is off because the number of autistic participants to the number of nerotipical participants is 100 to 16, but i don't not understand it well enough and would appreciate help in educating myself further.
It's not uncommon for researchers to use unequal test subject pools. The point of this study was to find out whether oxalates affect autism symptoms or not and obviously 16 test subjects were enough to draw a conclusion.
Not exactly. The study correlated the presence of high bodily oxalate levels with autism. Theories were proposed as to possible mechanisms for oxalate action, but they were not evaluated in any experimental way.