Professor Johan Giesecke, Sweden’s chief pandemic epidemiologist, cautioned that it would be two years before anyone could really know what responses worked and which ones didn’t. It's now two years later. Sweden was right.

We really do need to talk about Sweden

Two years on. Tegnell was right. Giesecke was right. Even I was right and I'm not an epidemiologist! Oh, and Ferguson was wrong.

Two years ago (before I was deplatformed by LinkedIn), I was sharing what I thought was insightful and helpful information from world-renown epidemiologists like Johan Giesecke who were criticizing the rest-of-the-world response to the COVID plandemic and inevitably supporting the much more reasonable Swedish approach.

The links and charts point out something we've been saying all along, that should have been obvious. The media lies by omission.

Yes, "covid" deaths were higher in Sweden, and if those are the only deaths that matter, then go ahead and take a blowtorch to the countryside. Ignore the All Cause Mortality. Ignore the deaths of despair, the increases in overdoes, suicides, medical issues not addressed for fear of leaving to meet your regular checkups.

It was the same problem with the vax trials. Ignore the fact that more people in the vaccinated groups were dying then the placebo groups, the only metric to be reported would be covid deaths. It mattered not how many had to die to prevent a covid death.

And now we have two years of All Cause mortality to see what was the more deadly, covid, or our reaction to it.

Professor Johan Giesecke, one of the world’s most senior epidemiologists, advisor to the Swedish Government, the first Chief Scientist of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, and an advisor to the director general of the WHO, was right, and sharing his insights would get people removed from social media for spreading "misinformation."