r/circlebroke•
Mutual

The /r/gameofthrones circlejerk over HBO not offering a standalone service is infuriating.

Threads in question: Take My Money, HBO!

Sorry, but HBO Doesn't Want Your Money

While some of the posters clearly understand that HBO is a business that is (gasp!) out to make as much as possible, others are so ridiculously entitled that it legitimately upsets me. Look at me, I'm getting mad over something on the internet!

Look, I would love for HBOGo to be a standalone service. But I'm not going to delude myself into thinking that HBO should take less per subscription per month to cater to me. They have a good thing going with the $17-25+/month per subscriber they get from the cable companies. To suggest that "some money is better than none" (because duh, of course I'm gonna pirate it), so they should happily take the suggested $12/month is so ludicrously disingenuous that it makes my blood boil.

And all this from a subreddit that I usually enjoy! Ugh.

Posted Jun 6, 2012, 9:53 PM UTC

4645
potpan0•

'But we like it, so we should get it for cheaper' is the default reddit opinion, and it is so infuriating.

47
exNihlio•

I want it, thefore I deserve to have it. Since I deserve to have it, I get to choose it's delivery method. If I don't like the delivery method, then that is your fault and you don't deserve my business, therefore I will take it. I like your product, but not enough to buy it or wait for it.

Why aren't you competing with piracy HBO! WHY? WHY? WHY? PIRATEBAY FOR LIFE!

31
potpan0•

Exactly, it's this 'More for less' mentality.

9
exNihlio•

I think a big problem with this, at least on reddit, is things like Steam sales. Steam discounts games that have been out for awhile or to stimulate sales on game after the initial rush of purchases. This creates a mentality of everything being able to be discounted infinitely.

The fact of the matter is that the first season of GoT cost 50-60 million dollars to make. One season of one series. High end television costs a lot to make. You can't just infinitely cut prices. If HBO thought that lowering prices would raise sales then they probably would.

15
potpan0•

With high end TV programs, you are basically making a 10 hour film. Therefore, they have to keep prices high.

I suppose you get into a big of a cycle though. You make program quality higher, so you need to spend more. You need to spend more, so you increase prices. You increase prices, so you need to make higher quality programs (to stop people unsubscribing). They can't really lower the price, as the quality would drop below what's expected, and the whole thing would cave in.

11
WildWaters•

I would love to ask these entitled redditors for a loan of $50 million.

Then tell them we're just going to give the series away.

6
BFKelleher•

No, you don't understand. If you charge less, people will buy more. Steam does it, therefore it will work in all industries and markets no matter what. In the end you'll end up making more money. Now, as a high schooler that has once listened to a Planet Money, I think I know everything about how economics works. /s

29
exNihlio•

Dude just imagine if it was free? Think of how many people would be buying it! They would make so much money. Shut up and take none of my money HBO!

10
Llort2•

it is a bell curve, you need to find where the peak is and stay there.

2
exNihlio•

I think people don't seem to realize that cable/satellite services and HBO/Showtime/Starz/Cinemax have symbiotic relationship. The fact that the only way to get premium cable access is through the gatekeepers of Comcast and DirecTV is a huge boost of subscribers for the the cable providers(and probably the only thing keepign them where they are). I am willing to bet that if HBO offered HBO Go for everyone then there would be some serious falling out with their main revenue source (cable and satellite providers).

Obviously HBO wants to reach as many people as possible but it can't afford to damage it's business in doing so. In the coming years, as more people cut the cord and switch to services like Hulu, Amazon streaming, Netflix and iTunes, the larger content providers will follow suit. Once the tipping point is reached their will be greater access.

Not withstanding the above, it really would be nice if HBO could facilitate the movement of their television series to DVD/Bluray and legitimate downloading services quicker. It does suck to have to wait a whole year to be able to purchase the product. Lots of television shows are available on iTunes the day after airing. Why not have GoT available a week after the season conclusion? At that point I would think that their main viewership is finished so...

23
hawaii_dude•

Both your points are extremely valid. I have cable, and practically the only thing I watch is HBO. As for your second point, expediting the availability of content would reduce piracy. It's been shown in the movie world that delayed worldwide release increases piracy.

7
exNihlio•

And this is something that they could campaign for. Instead they demand a la carte access (not going to happen) or 100% accesss for 9.99$ (BHWAHAHAH!). They could at least be realistic.

7
[deleted]•

Nail meet hammer.

They want something totally unrealistic, and use piracy as blackmail to try and get it. That way they get what they want but also don't have to pay, and can justify it to themselves. Cretins.

2
[deleted]•

I love r/gameofthrones, no lie. It's the only /r/ where I don't mind a sea of image macros. I'll take any content, any time, no matter how banal, trivial, or peripherally related to the source material, so deep is my passion for A Song of Ice and Fire, but the fans I occupy the forum with are some of the most snot-nosed Verruca Salts I've ever shared e-space with. I almost posted in that thread today but thought better of it at the last minute. The piracy fight is not one that I'm in any position to win. I rarely receive downvotes, but when I do it's in r/gameofthrones for calling out pirates.

The point I was going to make but didn't is that even if HBO went the streaming only option (this will not happen for decades, probably) the people bitching about how they only pirate because they lack this option will still pirate! I have no doubt at all about that. Sure, having to pay 60+ for cable plus an HBO package is fairly costly, but even 15 bucks a month is costly when you're used to getting it for free. People just want to pretend that that's the reason they pirate, not because they just want it for free because that way HBO is the bad guy and not them.

I'm not going to necessarily criticize digital piracy, I think we can all admit that we've downloaded something, but stop pretending it's the other guy's fault!

19
[deleted]•

[deleted]

11
[deleted]•

I'm subbed to both, but I actually prefer r/gameofthrones for the most part, crazy as that sounds, because I've basically discussed these books to death, ad nauseum and repeatedly for years. I prefer TWoP for thoughful discussion of the show, it's a generally more intelligent and thoughtful group of watchers than the average redditor so the quality of discussion is pretty high. And I use westeros.org for the latest news and such, it's pretty tight with George so they pretty much get it first, and the readership is usually more well-versed than the reddit crowd, I've noticed. Not that there's anything wrong with r/asoiaf, of course, but at that point there isn't much else left but image macros, fan art and theme song covers (all of which I enjoy) so...

I think I might be too invested in this book series, I've just realized. :)

6
[deleted]•

[deleted]

3
[deleted]•

TWoP is great. I will let you in on the worst kept secret in this fandom because as a fellow 'broker, I've got your back like that. I've never linked this thread in r/gameofthrones because I don't want people trolling the unsullied: the Completely Unspoiled Speculation Thread! Oh man, this thread is great, the tears of the unspoiled sustain me like nectar and the TWoP crowd is such a literate group of active watcher that the quality of their speculation/discussion is high. It's super entertaining as a book-walker, but also a good gauge to measure how successful the show is at getting things across to their non-book reading audience as well.

6
WhirlwindMonk•

the people bitching about how they only pirate because they lack this option will still pirate! I have no doubt at all about that.

Let me be a living, breathing counter-example for you. I pay for Netflix, Amazon Prime, and Crunchyroll (legal anime streaming site), I use Hulu free, and I rent movies from Family Video. If there is something I cannot get from these sources, and I really want to watch it, I pirate it. So long as I can pay 15 bucks a month and click a few buttons, or drive two minutes and pay $3.50 (or less for older movies), I will. It allows me to not only give money to the people who produce the entertainment I enjoy, it's also frequently more convenient than pirating.

Before these options were available, I used to pirate everything. Movies, music, tv shows, games, everything. But as soon as these services started providing me with the entertainment I wanted, at a price I could afford, through a service that's easy to use, I threw money at them.

So don't be so sure that the people complaining will still pirate. Some will, yes, but I imagine a measurable chunk would hand HBO their money if given the option.

3
Gogglor•

I like your Charlie and the Chocolate Factory reference.

1
TotallyNotCool•

More of the same jerking over in /r/technology

Although the top comments are seemingly more intelligent than the ones in r/GOT. Still there are some nice gems in there:

Things are changing soon, my buddy at HBO told me so

I'd gladly pay if I could! Piratebay FTW

I cancelled my cable because I'm so brave!

6
hawaii_dude•

Someone really needs to start a truetechnology subreddit or something because its just constant blogspam about torrenting and pirating now.

4
TotallyNotCool•

Yeah, definitely some alternative needs to be created to that crap.

(Someone has created r/republicoftechnology but it's not being used at all.)

3
Commisar•

please god YES. I unsubbed from r/technology because I COULD NOT STAND the CONSTANT pro-piracy jerking about how EVIL companies are for charging for a product and going after thieves.

1
theroachsays•

Well I believe HBO could make a good amount of money offering a standalone service with access to the same programming via PC, but for the same price as a subscription via cable or satellite. They are a business, but I think they would be smart to expand to PC/Mobile-only viewers. Just my own two cents.

5
MutualOP•

But they can't just expand into that market. Right now HBOGo acts as a perk for cable subscribers. HBO has a deal with the cable companies where they provide the bandwith for the streaming service, while HBO provides the content. In order for HBO to offer a standalone service, they'd have to cut out of their deal with the cable companies and start handling their own streaming service, similar to what Amazon or Netflix do.

9
theroachsays•

Like someone above stated, they eventually will move when the tide shifts to an internet-based medium of entertainment. They'll probably piggyback on that as they do with television-based entertainment. I'm one of the few who takes advantage of watching HBO programming at a friend's when taking care of the place or while traveling. It gets me interested into series where I buy their DVDs, but I would order HBO if I were on my own and it were an option for my television package. But I'm in agreement with you that it's not in their financial interest... yet.

4
TMWNN•

(The below is what I like posting to such threads. u/Mutual understates the level of circlejerkiness; these threads pop up at least once a week, every single week, and recently have been even more frequent since the second season just ended. The only other subjects that are as repetitively bad are "Since I've watched season 1/2 of the show, can I start reading the books with the second/third one in the series?" and "DAE think that George R. R. Martin will be able to finish the last two books before the show catches up? I'm of course the first person in the history of the universe to ask this question.")


Don't you know? Watching Game of Thrones for free is a fundamental human right. It says so in the Constitution or something. Anyone and anything that prevents you from watching a show that HBO spends tens of million a year making is WORSE THAN HITLER.

(Sigh.)

91% of the United States subscribes to cable or satellite. Yeah, yeah, I know, r/cordcutting and all that, but this figure has not significantly changed in years. In other words, 91% of the country either a) subscribes to HBO or b) can pay $10-13 per month to add it to their existing package. Assuming you subscribe for three months, $3-4 per episode the day of availability does not seem very much to pay for a show that the network spent $60 million to make in 2010 and $70 million in 2011.

5
[deleted]•

[deleted]

2
aco620•

I like both r/gameofthrones and r/asoiaf (kraken knuckles explained in this thread why it's possible to actually like r/gameofthrones even more than r/asoiaf despite what people tend to say about the two), but r/gameofthrones has REALLY been stuck in the same circlejerks for a while now.

DAE think this actor/tress deserves an award?

Here's an image macro of a memorable scene in last night's episode. Let's all quote other lines in that episode!

Arya and Syrio Forel will eventually get married and become the king and queen of Westeros after cutting off Joffrey's head because they're the best characters in any story ever!

Hodor. It is known. You know nothing John Snow. Oh sweet summer child. A man such and suches.

And of course the accessibility issue that op has brought up. I agree that I'd love an easier way to get a hold of the show, but if you want to keep seeing new episodes of it, you're gonna have to deal with what HBO believes is the best way to fund it. A cheaper package means that HBO will have to sell exponentially more subscriptions in order to get the money they're hoping for, and that doesn't always work in practice.

5
[deleted]•

No one's entitled to television ffs. Why are people so invested in "fixing" HBO's business model? Are they going to start demanding that Apple price its products according to a fixed Apple business model devised by its consumers, or that every game developer put their games on Steam for $19.99?

I just.. don't get it. Is this what we get after a century or so of modern advertising/consumerism, people so invested in entertainment that they form movements to gain access to it on their terms?

4
TheBoinkOfProgress•

Ok, so this isn't from r/gameofthrones, but there was a thread in r/technology that actually had a few people explaining the situation well, and explaining thatHBO can't work the way it oes, offering high-concept and expensive dramas at a loss like it does if it went a la carte, and in response to one such explanation, this guy replies that HBO needs to rework its entire business models because he's "seen multiple professional webcomics and amateur rage comics on this subject alone" and then types out that Oatmeal comic that everyone uses to justify their piracy.

I've seen many, many armchair economists here on Reddit, but I think this is the firsst one I've seen to use r/fffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu as his evidence.

2
fashizzIe•

"Shut up and take my-"

Shut the fuck up

2
[deleted]•

While some of the posters clearly understand that HBO is a business that is (gasp!) out to make as much as possible, others are so ridiculously entitled that it legitimately upsets me. Look at me, I'm getting mad over something on the internet!

I see this kind of rhetoric popping up all throughout circlebroke and it I don't agree with it. Everyone and their dog realises that HBO's primary goal is to make money.

However what many of you don't realise is that it isn't unfair to make requests of a business to take a slight hit in their income to please and satisfy the wants of the consumer. Why? Because doing this can actually create more revenue down the track due to consumer loyalty, word of mouth and satisfying your consumers.

Just because you disagree with the specific thing Reddit is crying over doesn't invalidate the concept behind it.

A business model is a two-way street. The producers do their thing and the consumers do their thing. So many of you are acting like both should be totally seperate entities. But that isn't how it works. If a group of consumers get together and attempt to demand a new feature for the producers to provide - that's their right. That is a good thing. This is how the market progresses and things move forward. This does not make them entitled. If everyone just shut up about services they didn't like then we wouldn't have many of the wonderful things we have today.

This place is really going downhill in quality. It seems like every idea that gets popular on reddit is criticised here mindlessly. Anyone who attempts to defend said idea is met with disagreement downvoters and their opinion is stiffled. It's ironic because this subreddit was supposed to be about elevating ourselves from the nonsense that plagues Reddit - but it falls to all the same vices.

2
MutualOP•

You don't find the whole "well, I can't watch it right away, so I'll just pirate it" to be just a wee bit entitled? Or the idea that it's okay to pirate the show because, hey, everyone at work is talking about it, so if I don't watch the show right away, how can I gossip at the water cooler? If that's not entitlement, I don't know what is.

Also, I never once said their argument is invalid. Never. I just think it's naive to think that HBO isn't catering to reddit's wants because they're stubborn, or something of that nature. When it comes down to it, the vast majority of their subscribers are happy with their current model. Additionally, asking HBO to take less money while simultaneously taking on more (costly) responsibilities is slightly unreasonable. No company would ever do that that, at least not until the demand for whatever product becomes greater than for what they currently offer.

I also don't see anyone downvoting anyone in here. Not quite sure what that last paragraph was about.

1
[deleted]•

You don't find the whole "well, I can't watch it right away, so I'll just pirate it" to be just a wee bit entitled?

Not at all. It's a condition of the industry and it happens everywhere. If you have a product that people want, and they can't access it legally - they'll take it illegally. That's just what happens on the internet. No amount of moral outrage can change that. You only have two options:

  • Roll with it and use it to your advantage

or

  • Don't roll with it and have your show pirated.

That's about it. Whether or not we agree or disagree with piracy is totally irrelevant, that's reality. That's what happens. Some businesses realise this and are extremely clever and adaptable and they make a lot of money out of it. HBO aren't. And it is their own damn fault. Everyone can argue until the cows come home, but it doesn't change one fact: HBO aren't being adaptable to the piracy curve ball. You have to be.

And don't try to claim that piracy is the thing to blame here - it isn't. There are plenty of examples of artists, entertainers and businesses who have almost completely negated the effects of piracy through using the internet to reach out to their consumers and to increase accessibility.

Another really important fact that you haven't really touched on is the main reason Redditors are angry about this. It's because HBO have acted like dicks over it. They have come out and tried to blame pirates and piracy as the cause of their problems - whilst completely ignoring the fact that millions of fans aren't given a means to acquire the series.

That was a stupid move that certainly didn't help. Making the show available with HULU or a similar website would make them millions of dollars and would certainly reduce a fair chunk of those pirates. It was downloaded 25 million times in a few months. Obscene figures that are clearly an indication of a consumer base not having access to it.

Yes, you can say "But making GoT available to watch legally online will cost HBO more money!" Yes, but it will also give them a lot of money and it will stop the problem they are having right now.

There is more than enough grounds for consumers to express their thoughts over this. I probably would do myself if I was an American and I liked Game of Thrones.

I also don't see anyone downvoting anyone in here. Not quite sure what that last paragraph was about.

It was a reflect on the subreddit as a whole - not this specific thread. My apologies.

1
MutualOP•

Sorry, but offering hbogo as a standalone service will absolutely not solve the problem. Time and time again, we've seen companies offer great deals and packages, and yet people still pirate content at an almost obscene level. Look at The Witcher 2. Released without any DRM, no zany "license to play" format, and yet it was still one of the most pirated games of the year.

I also disagree with the notion that HBO will make more money by offering a standalone service, at least right now. They're lining their pockets with greater subscriber payments (much more than the $12 number that's been kicked around) and lucrative cable deals. Until the demand for a standalone streaming service exceeds this, they have no reason to offer one.

For what it's worth, I do agree that HBO have been jerks about it, and I foresee in the next ten years or so some bug changes in the industry at large. Perhaps we'll start seeing some a la carte services popping up, though it would take quite a few companies doing so before big cable hops on board. There's a lot of money at stake, and the prospect of losing big premium content providers makes big cable all kinds of uncomfortable.

1
BritishHobo•

Does it anyone else the way people disingenuously respond to 'so you'll steal it?' by smugly pointing out the semantic difference, when they know full bloody well what point the commenter is trying to make (ie you're consuming the product for free)?

Anyway, did anyone link that fucking Oatmeal comic yet? The only drawing that can make me legitimately angry. Makes me want to just take all his comics and scrub his name off of them and then post 'em all over the internet. But I won't. Because I'm the bigger person.

1
nakedladies•

Hmm. Not sure how to feel about this one. On the one hand, yeah, that discussion ran the topic into the ground. On the other, come on, it's a group of Game of Thrones fans who want to watch their favourite show in a more convenient way than is currently available. What do you expect? 237 comments about how HBO is doing absolutely everything perfectly?

My jimmies are also slightly rustled by the idea that any conversation that takes place that may have a predictable outcome is a "circlejerk". "Circlejerk" implies everyone agreeing with one another with no exceptions. What I saw was an actual discussion about what fans want and what they may actually achieve. Yeah, a lot of people were saying "I'd happily pay an amount I can afford", but there were also people giving a more balanced point of view.

At the time of writing this comment, here are the top comment threads on that post are as follows (I sort by "Best"):

  1. Just make sure you buy the physical release when it's eventually released.

  2. "HBO Go will never be a standalone service without breaking contract with those companies."

  3. "I think that the people who are best qualified to figure out what HBO should do are probably a group of businessman, statisticians, and economists that HBO has hired who have all the relevant data and are familiar with the exact benefits and drawbacks of the current business plan."

  4. "hbo gets paid by the cable companies to not do stuff like this (in writing it would be worded more like "exclusive" or some shit). So this will probably never happen for a price that would seem fair to us."

The four best comment threads, each of which are more in line with your own views on the subject than some imaginary hivemind opinion. Now, I ask you, is this really a circlejerk?

1
MutualOP•

I think my jimmies were rustled by the comments stating some manner of "great, HBO can continue doing what they do, and I'll continue watching their shows for free.", along with the upvotes they were getting. Also, most of those reasonable comments have circlejerk-y responses, similar to the one mentioned above. Heck, my above example might have actually been one if the responses to one of the ones you highlighted.

0
causeofrecession•

Lost your credibility when you said you love r/gameofthrones. It's r/funny but with only one topic. What do you expect?

0
MutualOP•

That's why I subscribe to it. I have r/asoiaf for all my serious discussions about the books and tv show. I have r/gameofthrones for the silliness.

4