Twins Attendance Adjusted for City Population
Mods, feel free to delete this if it isn't allowed, but it is related to the Twins and I thought it was interesting. I was really bored this afternoon at the game since we were getting whooped, and looking at attendance numbers, and I realized that all of the sites that I could find always just showed average attendance at the stadium, without considering the size of the city/metro. I didn't think this is ok, because if you look at a city like St. Louis, it is much more impressive for them to have 38,000 people at a game (which is 10% of the entire city), than for LA to get 50,000 at a game (1% of the city).
I know that there is some weird districting so I ranked using city, county (except for Toronto, since Canada doesn't do counties), and metro, and averaged them together to try to adjust for districting differences, to see which teams bring out the most fans when you also consider the size of the city. I know it isn't perfect, but it's got to be better than just looking at average attendance.
TL;DR if you look at attendance per 100K people in the city/county/metro, the Twins are 10th, not 21st.
The maths: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bTKjFYQw2lsnQyuMowWjnGjlA77Jdevho0pQjewUqr0/edit?usp=sharing
Posted Jun 13, 2022, 3:53 AM UTC
Good idea and nice chart. I agree that just going off raw attendance numbers is a bit unfair but I think this system is a bit unfair to the super big cities like LA, Chicago and NYC. Their parks still only hold like 40k-60k people, and it’s not like just because Yankee Stadium is in NYC means it’s accessible to all NYC citizens.
What if the comparisons also used % filled in some way? Dodger stadium seats like 56k so drawing 49k a game is actually pretty darn good.
That’s a good idea! I’ll add that tomorrow