Why do people hate the actual Meta?
I often read that people find the actual Meta bad and boring and want to have a new one. Mostly they never say why they do so, and I personally can't see anything bad in the actual Meta. It's pretty variable (Every champ has some place where he fits in the Meta(especially in the Elo where most of the players are)), while giving a logical and common foundation for soloqueue, which pretty much everyone knows.
Maybe I'm not really sure what they expect, but there will probably never be an "full-cs-support"-Meta as there aren't enough income sources for everyone in the game. Also I don't think that they want a no jungle "double-double-lane"-Meta, as most already complain about going bot with somebody else. Be it the support who doesn't ward or the AD-Carry who doesn't last hit. Without a jungler you can imagine that the same will occur in the other double lane. But maybe they just miss the level one bush fights?
The only new Meta I can imagine is a double middle Lane as you have the best mapcontroll from there, but that's not the point I trying to make.
To make it short: My point is that the actual meta is nice, as it allows you to pretty much make everything what you want. Want to have a roaming support? You can do it. Want to play double AD-Carry? You can do it. Want to play double AP? You can do it. You want to play double jungle? You can do it.
So to end the whole thing: Why do people hate the actual Meta?
Posted Jun 23, 2012, 11:59 PM UTC