At what point does public discussion of someone's religious views become a discussion of potential mental illness or compromised reality? [self]

author: t-bass (2 months) | author karma: 1/439 | original story's comments | [flag](http://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%23atheismbot&subject=flag&message=Please describe why you are flagging this submission - http://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/vi4f9/at_what_point_does_public_discussion_of_someones/)

This almost went to politics, but it's probably better here. A very current example would be a political ad describing how Mitt Romney (and other Mormons) believe that they may become gods, which could be construed to suggest an unstable mental state. After all, a secular politician who said he believed that he may become a god in the near future would be labeled a crackpot at best, and a man telling a cop the same thing on a street corner might be locked up for observation or at the least thought to be unstable.

So where is the line drawn between pointing out potential mental health and/or judgement problems and "attacking" someone for their religious beliefs?

Met criteria: ups>4 and score>3