Is it worth going through the NGH?
I have been studying hypnosis privately for some time now, and I'm debating whether or not to take the plunge and begin discussing with the NGH about certification. My hypnotism is far from perfect, but I have some basics down and would like to expand my techniques. I feel like training from a certified teacher may help this and even if I don't agree with everything the teacher says, I may be able to divine more uses I hadn't thought or even dreamed of before.
For those wondering, my style is very basic and direct, and mainly journey's through introspection and the subconscious with occasional PHS's, though those have shown only minor efficacy (then again, I am still working on that a lot...haven't had much practice).
Opinions? Advice? Questions? Thank you for your time.
Posted Jul 22, 2012, 4:05 AM UTC
You've only asked half of a question. Is it worth it for what? What is your final goal?
Honestly, certification is a bit of BS. There is no governing body regarding hypnosis. Organizations like the NGH effectively answer to nobody but themselves.
If your goal is just to expand your techniques, buy some books, and read. It'll cost a crap ton less than getting a "certified" teacher. Most "certified" teachers are skilled hypnotists, but poor teachers.
Practice will make you better. Start small, and stay safe. Grow slowly. Or not. In about 10 hours I could teach anyone interested enough to do basic hypnotherapy and stage shows. They wouldn't be very good, but their subjects won't really notice or care.
My ultimate goal is as of yet undecided.
I am intending to use hypnosis for therapeutic purposes, though learning some stage hypnosis would be nice as well.
I'm trying to perfect the direct approach before focusing on mastery of the indirect approach of Milton Erickson.
As for the growing, I've advanced from where I began (made a large error early on so I've been cautious since). But I fear my caution is limiting my growth and I would appreciate some instruction from someone more experienced than myself.
Hypnosis is a broad topic, and without a goal you will accomplish very little, becoming familiar with a lot, but skilled at almost nothing.
Here's my thoughts, which are surely unpopular in this subreddit.
Therapeutic hypnosis can be a great thing. It's unfortunate that it is unregulated, and requires no other training than knowing about hypnosis. Most health care professionals I've met don't belong in the industry. This is ten times more true for "hypno-therapists". Armed with 10-20 hours of training, and typically no understanding of psychology or counselling, they decide that they're capable of helping people.
Stage hypnosis is an abomination. Publicly embarrassing cooperative people for money is just tacky, tacky, tacky.
Caution is keeping you from moving too slowly? Fucking right that it should. Hypnosis is poorly understood. An instructor will tell you that everything is fine, hypnosis is safe, please give me your money and I'll make you a better hypnotist.
Learning slowly will give you time to digest what you've learned. That will make you a better hypnotist, not listening to what someone else has figured out.
Ask yourself "why" all of the time. Why do you want to master indirect induction? Why are some people easier to hypnotize than others? Why am I interested I hypnosis? Why does rapid induction work? Why am I having trouble brining this person out? Why, if hypnosis is like (x hours of) restful sleep can we not substitute it for sleep?
Asking these questions and thinking about the answers will teach you more than someone who really just wants your money. It will also teach you about the nature of hypnosis, and yourself. It will teach you to ask better questions, which in turn will teach you to ask better questions. These questions will make you better, because you will have thought about and understand the underlying principles, and not been told them.