Reddit, what were your earliest practical experiences with Photography? what did you grow up with? what did you love and hate about it; the gear, the experiences, how did it effect you?

I was just thinking about both the difficulty's and ease of growing into photography in the digital age.

For myself my first 'real' camera was a Soviet era Zenit model E, in the early 90's, with a broken selenium meter, age 12, and I hated that thing, I still kinda do, no metering, no split prism, just a poorly ground glass focusing screen that merely shows greater to lesser extents of fussyness as a focusing aid.

Most of my time spent with that thing was asking my dad "what's this?" to which half the time the reply was "250 f16" He withstood about a whole two years of that before buying me a cheep Praktica with a spot meter and a split prism, that's perseverance!

I ended up making more use of (borrowing) his Minolta 7000 Dynax In my later teens, which was probably partly responsible for a decreased interest in Photography in my late teens (that, and mostly being a teenager) as my dads own interest also declined, when I look back on it now, I think I can see why, while very advanced for its time the Minolta detracted somewhat from some of the decision making processes of Photography, it was was far easier to let it do auto everything than it was to chose or think about anything, not having it in front of me I recal it has about 5 main buttons and a toggle switch to control near everything, not very intuitive, but more impotently: also removing a naturally induced pause to contemplate.

For me that probably took a lot of thinking out of the process, but for my dad, a guy who had grown up shooting Speed Graphics's and Yashica's, he probably hated the fact he didn't fully understand it.

It took me from my late teens to mid-twentys before I decided I wanted a camera again and bought my first digital camera, after which I practically had to relearn everything all over again, most of my model E shots are better than my 2005 digital shots (focus not withstanding ;)

After re-finding my footing, I still to this day shoot ~>50% of shots with my dslr on Manual, spot metering, choosing exactly where I want shadows, highlights or mid-tones to fall, old habits are dying hard.

I suspect the learning experiences of people born just 5 or 10 years later than me are infinitely different but no less informative...

Posted Sep 3, 2012, 1:24 AM UTC

89
BenjaminGeiger•

I can't remember all the way back, but I'd have to say that the first camera I could call my own was a Mickey-Matic. They were 110 cameras made by Kodak and sold at the Disney parks. I had one, my brother had one, and we almost never got our film developed because it was just so expensive.

My stepdad had an AE-1 that I wanted to learn to use, but never got a chance. At the time, I didn't even know that the lens was detachable; in fact, I don't remember whether he had more than one lens. All I remember was seeing the numerous controls and wanting to learn what they did.

In the meantime, I had a few other 110 cameras, and a 35mm point-and-shoot or three (plus a seemingly-never-ending stream of disposable cameras), but I never really got into photography all that much. I did, however, love playing with the one-dollar tiny 110 cameras, the kind that are barely large enough to hold a 110 film cartridge, and with viewfinders that are just a flip-up piece of plastic. These things made Holgas look like pro gear, but they were fun to play with. (Still, I almost never got my film developed, because... expensive.)

Fast forward about a dozen years. I'm in college, and my mom gives me a Christmas gift of a HP PhotoSmart m305, my first 'real' digital camera (not counting a quarter-VGA-resolution "JamCam"). It's 3.1MP, and I loved it. I shot everything with it. In fact, I even shot my brother's wedding with it. (That's a story in itself. Suffice it to say the wedding was set up in a hurry, and on the cheap, because the bride had cancer.)

The m305 did a great job at capturing images, but didn't exactly give me much control. So, on the advice of Corey Haines, I upgraded to a Canon PowerShot A590IS from eBay. A whopping 8 megapixels made my images that much clearer, plus I had the full P/Tv/Av/M mode set to play with.

(I gave the m305 to my dad. I still have the A590IS, but I don't use it much anymore.)

Once I got a Real Job, I realized that I wanted to take my interest in photography to the next level. Most of this was prompted by a coworker who moonlighted as a 'professional' photographer. (He's brilliant behind the lens, but has no business sense whatsoever.) Anyway, since all of my coworkers had Canon DSLRs, I bought a Rebel XT from eBay and started practicing.

When I upgraded to a Rebel T2i, I sold the XT to a coworker. Later, when I bought a 60D, I sold the T2i to the same coworker, who gave me back the XT. I still have the XT. (I upgraded from the T2i to the 60D for two things: manual audio control and an articulated screen. I rarely use either.)

6
pbarmasher0•

I remember those 110s. They came free with purchase of just about everything. I like the powershots, they focus well into microscope eyepieces.

1
The_Write_Stuff•

My first experience with photography was an old Argus C3 and some ancient light meter. I would carefully meter each shot and bracket exposures, the dog was my model.

Then, one day, my parents bought me a roll of film and that's when I learned what all the fuss was about. Hey, I was 6, give me a break.

3
SilenceSevenhttp://irregularphotos.com•

This will be kind of fun looking back.

Father had a Canon AE1 Program that I would rarely get to use, once I got a job I started looking for a camera. Bought a used AE1, and spent hours in my Mother's garden shooting all kinds of insects, etc.

This turned into a camera collecting/photography hobby for me for many years. I've owned and used a lot of different cameras. From old swing lens Kodak panoramic cameras to old box cameras when I could could still get roll film for them 620/120. LOTS of folding Kodak "pocket" cameras. I owned at one time three Graflex Crown Graphic cameras, two 4x5's, and one 2x3, that I used 120 roll film backs on. I used the Graflex cameras more like field cameras, Tripod, hood, ground glass magnifier etc.

Took a lot of trips to camera swap meets, got some deals, and got ripped off a couple times, live and learn.

Last film camera I bought was a used Canon A1, I loved that camera and took it everywhere. Still have it.

Big is no longer in my vocabulary when it comes to cameras, my first digital was a 3mp Olympus I received as a gift. Went through batteries like crazy. Second, Canon S5-IS, I still use it to death only 12x optical zoom, but I love it. And I recently bought a Canon G12, and am having a lot of fun with it.

edit: film type

3
azuled•

I wish I could remember the camera itself. It was a classicley styled SLR, split prism focusing, in finder meter, probably a kit lens. It was my mothers, but after I was about 8 she got sick of taking pictures of my brother and I so I ended up getting it 90% of the time.

I think my brother has it somewhere, I still shoot my dSLR as if it were that camera, and I still approach taking pictures as if I were using it.

2
pbarmasher0•

I started off with a Kodak 110 camera. It was the only thing I could have. It took swell pictures, especially for an 8 year old. I went through about a roll a month, almost a picture a day. Dad had a 126 instamatic. Cheap even by early 80s standards. I was given that when he got a Rioch that needed batteries and had auto wind! Pretty fancy for us at the time. This was for our big trip to England in 1986. I saw England twice, as he kept dropping the lenscap for the snap on telephoto and I had to go back. The 126 was actually a worse camera than the 110. It took the same magic cube flash bulbs, and the film cost a bit more. It was slower with a worse lens. I used that camera for several years, I even got a photo of one of my childhood heros Bill Mauldin, the WW2 comic artist with it. Dad used that Rioch through the mid 90s, now I have it. In Jr high a close friend of mine introduced me to his Rolleiflex. As I couldn't afford one I picked up a Kodak Duaflex 160 rollfilm camera. I had a gross of the big 25B flashbulbs and I was set. I had to special order the film as I didn't know I could re roll 120. Cost every cent I had but as I loved the 1940s it was well worth it. By this time I got to use dad's Rioch, and I still had that little 110. Those took me through college.

In college I discovered antique cameras, and got to use the campus dark room. I also got Grandpa's Kodak Retina Reflex. I wore that thing out! I was using ancient Kodak folders with cut film, and really got into rollfilm. After I graduated I stuck with the Retina and things slowed down until I bought a house a couple years after graduation.

I had a house and put in a darkroom. I bought a Rolleichord, used the hell out of it. The Retina broke, so I was shooting 120 all the time. I had about 15 120 cameras with film in them at any given time. 3 Kodak No.2s with 50, 400, and 3600 for shooting wherever I was. I got so good with those box cameras that I took them to museums and shot indoors with no flash. That 3600 film is great! I got 3 different Zeiss folders that then superseded the box cameras. I took the Rollei everywhere too. Also a FED rangefinder. I love that camera. I also got the large format bug. I ran out and found a Graflex and started using it. I bought a hunting vest with the big pocket in the back that I kept about 15 holders in. Dad found me an Eastman 2D 8x10 camera. That thing is great fun to use.

Around 2005 I was doing vacuum deposition stuff in the basement shop. A 'friend' suggested I try silver and make Daguerreotypes. So off to a new hobby. I had moderate success doing dags and my wife got me a Daguerreotype camera for my birthday one year. The same year I was given all the equipment from a retiring Dag guy. I was set. Talking to the guy who made the camera I decided to try wetplate. sigh. I have not taken a film shot in 3 years. I drag my wetplate stuff everywhere. Took it into Boundary Waters once, too. I started using the Graflex with a modified holder for my modern i.e. not living history stuff. The f/4.5 is a great time saver, I can get indoor shots of objects in 4 minutes. With a flash I can do portraits in 6 seconds. (Need a bigger light bank to get it faster)

I've had a few digital point and shoots for snapshots, and I still use that old Rioch. I've still got all those 120 cameras, folders, box cameras and the like plus 4 wet plate cameras. I've been occasionally tempted by a nice DSLR, but that money would get me a nice full plate Petzval... I'm one of the few who went backwards with photography, I love it and haven't looked back. (edit: formatting was bizarre)

2
Soulbow•

My earliest experience with photography was more of an assistant to my dad. I'd be driving the boat in circles for far too long so he could get the shot he wanted. For a 12 year old, this was about as boring as it can get.

Still, without experiences like that I wouldn't have many of the skills I do today, most notably 10 years of Photoshop experience by age 21.

My first camera was a film Canon point and shoot which I thoroughly enjoyed. I moved to digital once I got an Olympus C5050Z for Christmas one year, and have been shooting digital ever since, aside from a few occasional film projects.

2
colourful64•

I started out with a kodak disc. That lasted about two diac then a pentax k1000 , a canon ae1 then the cannona1... A few nikons and nikonis , canonxs, and a t2i nbetweeen and it was the pentax dslr cant remwmber that name.. Then the pentax kx k5 and the k7.. Pentax are my favorite by far

1
pbarmasher0•

Wow, I almost forgot about the disc!

1