-bxp

Here's a prompt which will pump out excellent reviews with just a few of your poorly worded observations:

https://chatgpt.com/share/6aa484c9-69b4-83ec-900e-1191afe0c3cb

I've purchased testing equipment for electronics, wind meters for fans to do really detailed and valuable reviews and I worked out most users and Amazon don't care. The introduction of the grading system killed my enthusiasm even more and now the switch to silver I've basically looked for the most efficient way to get the job done.

I fed ChatGPT a lot of my own personal reviews and then ask for it to give me a prompt to try and reproduce what I know are excellent reviews. With this prompt I can put the product URL, title a

I've been awake since 4am following the tracker and I'm still processing. Vincent Bouillard just won Western States 100. Not the men's race. The race. He crossed that track in Auburn at 13:46:15 and he was first. I want to make sure that's landing before we go any further.

Now look. I'm not going to pretend the physiological literature isn't complicated here. We know what the research says about male fragility at ultra distances. The documented durability gap. The way men's bodies begin negotiating with themselves somewhere past mile 70 in ways that female physiology simply isn't subject to. Coaches have known this quietly for years. And yet. Here we are.

What makes this result almost impo

Week in and week out, we’re told the AFL is the hardest game in the world to umpire- we get it Dimma. The real issue isn't the number of rules or the complexity, it’s that we’ve completely lost the plot on what the umpire’s role is.

Back in the 80s, yes I'm old, the umpire’s decision was final. If they got it wrong, that was just footy, play on. It was baked into the sport that an arbiter is a human being operating in real-time. Today, we’ve conditioned the entire industry to believe that perfect officiating is not only possible but mandatory and expected.

We’ve essentially replaced the concept of a human umpire with the impossible expectation of a robot umpire. Thanks to high-frame-rate,

Woke up to this email this morning, just to keep me guessing:

We removed one or more of your recent customer reviews because we noticed some unusual reviewing activity on this product. We place limits on reviews to preserve trust in customer reviews.

To learn more about this policy, go to "Community Guidelines": http://www.amazon.com.au/review-guidelines

Once we remove a review that does not comply with our guidelines, the reviewer may not submit any new reviews on the same product.

Amazon Review Moderation team

No idea what is removed or if anything specific is actually wrong, I couldn't find anything in my reviewed list which is gone, but I don't track anything any more, so

https://www.amazon.com.au/dp/B0D4831Q5Z

I can't work out if this discount is because I 'purchased' a doorbell or this is related to Prime. I wanted to get a Sync Module 2 to put a USB stick in for the doorbell rather than paying for the subscription.

The module itself = $59

1 camera system is $99, and I figured I'd give it a go because it comes with a module, so essentially a camera for $40 on top of the module's price

I noticed the 2-camera system that is $179 is 50% off, I thought that was sweet- two cameras and a module for $89.50 BUT at checkout it takes $130 off and you get the 2-camera system for $49.

Would be interested to know if anyone with Prime can get it, because I opene

I thought it was fixed and had some reviews trickling through to the approved list. Overnight I had 14 transferred to the other tab as 'not approved', and others which were approved are now not. Now I'm up to 20, which makes the 90% a bit more challenging because I'm getting more than 10% not get through, so can't catch up.

Is everyone else still having issues?

It really seems like GC is on a collision path with the AFL with Rowell declaring he ain't changing and Hardwick seemingly fine with how his player is approaching the contest. The increase in incidents is evident (20 in '23, 56 in '24) so it's reasonable that something had to change

Are we going to implement a stupid rule because one person wants to push the boundary?

What is GC going to do if it happens?

Is the AFL going to blink and send him to the tribunal, just to fine him?

I'm just a little surprised that GC don't seem to care about what is being asked of them and is ready for what seems like an almost inevitable fight...but I don't understand why or their angle? Can't say I'd have