Atimo3

This is a TV show with the most hamfisted metaphors, the most plot contrivances and the most patronizing political commentary imaginable. And the audience celebrates all of that because they are totally “owning the chuds who idolize Homelander”. These people are genuinely patting themselves in the back because they are so brilliant that they can understand that the guy who kills people for laughs is the bad guy.

Every time the writers make the shittiest most idiotic take at whatever Trump said on twitter they celebrate because surely this is the thime they are going to successfully freak the people making shitposts on the internet where Homelander says something “redpilled”, or whatever g

Just that, some gringo sexpest looking straight to the camera, saying he was going to my city, asking for a young girl and the ad link was to his whatsapp.

I support the immediate nuking of anyone north of Río Bravo.

For the kids in the room, Two and a Half Men was an extremely popular sitcom that ran for 12 seasons. It initially centered around the misadventures of two brothers Alan and Charlie Harper. High brow opinions may have hot takes on Chuck Lorre’s writing style but the general consensus on the general public is that the show was fucking hilarious.

The premise was more or less a rehash of the of 1968 The Odd Couple, down to the protagonists having more or less the same haircuts. However, while the character of Alan was more or less a carbon copy of its 60s counterpart (being a cheap, divorced, weak and neurotic dork) Charlie was a bit different (re

For the kids in the room, Two and a Half Men was an extremely popular sitcom that ran for 12 seasons. It initially centered around the misadventures of two brothers Alan and Charlie Harper. High brow opinions may have hot takes on Chuck Lorre’s writing style but the general consensus on the general public is that the show was fucking hilarious.

The premise was more or less a rehash of the of 1968 The Odd Couple, down to the protagonists having more or less the same haircuts. However, while the character of Alan was more or less a carbon copy of its 60s counterpart (being a cheap, divorced, weak and neurotic dork) Charlie was a bit different (re

For the kids in the room, Two and a Half Men was an extremely popular sitcom that ran for 12 seasons. It initially centered around the misadventures of two brothers Alan and Charlie Harper. High brow opinions may have hot takes on Chuck Lorre’s writing style but the general consensus on the general public is that the show was fucking hilarious.

The premise was more or less a rehash of the of 1968 The Odd Couple, down to the protagonists having more or less the same haircuts. However, while the character of Alan was more or less a carbon copy of its 60s counterpart (being a cheap, weak and neurotic dork) Charlie was a bit different (retaining hi

Mary Sue / Gary Stu is a strange aspect of pop culture as it seemly manage to dodge a precise definition and yet can be immediately recognized by the public at large. People will sometimes try to make a list of characteristics that are common to the Sues only to be immediately rebutted with some counterexample of a flagrant Gary Stu that exhibits none of the characteristics. The entire situation sort of resembles the opinion of Supreme Court judge Potter Stewart when trying (and failing) to define pornography in legal terms: “I know it when I see it”.

So what’s up with this situation? Why is that we can look at the average anime isekai and instantly know in our guts beyond any shadow of a