Beginning_Pattern688

That is all. I love that scrungly little gremlin.

Slavery, worker exploitation, the environmental impact of a product, etc. Are all things you can pass legislation on. Systemic fixes for systemic issues. You can't pass legislation stating that Nazis or homophobes can't make music or something.

Should we only tackle the bigger picture here too?

-Fighting against bad ideas so there's less horrible people in general.

-Achieving legal protections for marginalized groups so that said horrible people can't use their money to hurt them.

I think that's obviously all well and good but I don't get why we shouldn't also convince as many people as possible to not give these assholes financial support.

Why shouldn't we criticize individuals who g

No poll this time, this is an open question.

I'm interested to know where people here draw the approximate line past which you shouldn't buy something. Or if there should even be a line at all.

Buying [thing] doesn't make you a bad person, you just want to enjoy [thing].

Your individual choice not to buy [thing] will not have a significant impact anyway.

Also, people who care about not buying [thing] are terminally online, most people don't care.

Lastly, the people who say they won't buy [thing] probably buy [other things], making them hypocrites. And isn't that the worst sin of all?

View Poll

View Poll

View Poll