Contrary_Terry
u/Contrary_Terry
-
So RAW it seems that even if the DM were using the mechanic of random blind attacks where they roll to determine which square is hit then Sanctuary would still apply and force a save by the attacker, but it seems that thematically this is similar to an area of effect. So for example if the enemy is raining arrows down in an area would the Sanctuary spell really cause the archers to divert there arrows away from that spot despite not targeting the warded creature specifically?
-
Path of Tranquility allows sanctuary to be cast on yourself once a minute for 8 hours essentially. It describes this as “you can become an island of calm in even the most chaotic of situations”. My understanding
My campaign is going to be set in 1487 and I've started Lost Mines of Phandelver (the exact date hasn't come up yet, but I know that's a slight tweak on the raw adventure). They haven't even made it to Phandalin yet, but I plan to slowly build toward the larger world events they may choose to get involved in after LMoP (like the Chosen being used to influence what will be the new status quo and other elements of the second sundering). Before we started I gave them a one minute summary of key points/my best interpretation of the creation myth believed in Faerun. I started by saying that Ao, the overgod created the goddesses of light and dark and immediately had it pointed out by the one playe
I posted a question that probably wouldn't have gotten responses anyways, but I didn't see how it violated the rules. Some mods were nice enough to talk to me about it, and it seems that I violated rule 2. However: I didn't ask for advice; it is in no way about me (and I tried to not make it about any specific redditor by not posting a link to the example comment, but the mods didn't seem to think there were any soapbox/rule 5 problems); and, since it is based on an observation of Reddit, it isn't "only relevant to my experience".
Based on the comment "the reason is that people will respond to [an example] rather th
Creative license on these users backstory and motives is suggested (as always don't post identifying information). These might be power users that many consider villains or someone from this, but you want to show (read as make up) their side; they might be a troll who is actually a dissident against Reddit's feudal system; or they might have made the mistake of commenting that they hate Snowden, but really they have inside information on the NSA plot employing him for a controlled leak before the actual activist could leak the surveillance programs.
Maybe I'm an idiot, but I could not figure out how to expand it, after I accidentally collapsed it (even after reading the discussion you have linked). What finally helped was someone showed me this. I'm guessing there are plenty other fools like me, so it would be really helpful to add this pic to 'Have you thought about the collapsing sidebar at all?' section of the FAQ.
A couple days ago the left hand sidebar disappeared. I can still gain access to the multis I created that I remember the names of, but I don't see anywhere else that I can get the list of my multis, so I assume it isn't just that they moved it somewhere else.
The kids probably know their own life stories already.
If you have a problem with Ted not going into detail on that, then you have a problem with the basic concept of the show that made this inevitable from episode 1. Maybe what you are looking for is a tie-in series based around one or both of the children in their twenties; too bad near future fiction is almost always hokey.
!["This dog just appeared out of nowhere and followed us for an entire week during our trekking trip in the Himalayan outback...When I decided to get up at 4 a.m. to climb the next 5000 m peak...he accompanied me as well. On the top he was sitting for the entire 30 m..." (3- ) [r/Earth**** repost]](http://ppcdn.500px.org/52866292/9e944f286e9ba110135839dca1aff8a18e18ffe8/2048.jpg)
In r/KidsOnline, I need a way for readers (particularly parents) to leave a comment warning other readers that a link contains content that they may consider inappropriate without readers who are using the subdomains (typically their children) being able to read the same comment (so they can put specifics like that the word damn is used, so parents can decide whether that is acceptable, but, if their seven year old has control of the mouse, the kid can't make it show the comment). Anyways, this is the code so far:
a[href="/nsf5"] {
color: #222222;
background: #CCCCCC;
/*background-image: url(%%Caution%%);
background-repeat: no-repeat; */
padding: 0px 0px 0px 10px;
cursor: text
![We Love the Rain the Most by Katarzyna Marcinkowska (5- ) [r/adorableart repost]](http://fc06.deviantart.net/fs71/i/2010/320/4/3/we_love_the_rain_the_most____by_grzanka-d2o76fi.jpg)