Doubleplus_Ultra

I’ve never really been a believer of any religion, but they are interesting to learn about. But learning about religions with many afterlives sort of clicked that not only do they have no proof, but they sort of give away the real truth of death in the way that they fail to describe anything different. Let me explain:

All afterlives basically boil down to two things- continuation of daily life, or oblivion of the consciousness.

In the good places, you’re not supposed to be unhappy ever, but you also live forever. Without explaining too much, this means that inevitably your being must become simply suspended in a happy state forever. No more new thoughts because that will either run the ris

I’ve never really been a believer of any religion, but they are interesting to learn about. But learning about religions with many afterlives sort of clicked that not only do they have no proof, but they sort of give away the real truth of death in the way that they fail to describe anything different. Let me explain:

All afterlives basically boil down to two things- continuation of daily life, or oblivion of the consciousness.

In the good places, you’re not supposed to be unhappy ever, but you also live forever. Without explaining too much, this means that inevitably your being must become simply suspended in a happy state forever. No more new thoughts because that will either run the ris

I’m writing this post while clearing out sculk with mending-fortune and silk touch hoes. I like to get both silk touch and fortune tools, and put mending on them both, however fortune has the distinct advantage in some cases where gathering a bit of XP while mining/digging/hoeing away will be able to replenish most if not all durability loss. This leads me to use silk touch less.

To balance this while also giving silk touch more use cases for those who aren’t currently engaged in a building project that requires fragile materials- silk touch should increase the durability that a tool has in order to simulate the tool being used more delicately and therefore not wearing on the tool as much.

If the Large Slimes bump up against some of the other hostile creatures (Zombie, Skeleton, Spider, Creeper, Witch...) they have a chance of absorbing them.

In keeping with Minecraft’s style, this feature is simple and comical, with the creature clearly visible inside the large slime. But it also creates a unique problem for the player: the large slime by itself is weak, but slaying it results in two medium slimes and the hostile creature being freed.

This will not break slime farms as there won’t be any creatures but slimes in them.

Furthermore, this could be a hard-only feature. I would play in hard mode just to see this as I think it would be hilarious to find.

A long while ago I posted on Communism 101 but I got no replies. I’ll make it brief-

Social democracy is objectively the moderate wing of fascism.

this line of thinking is often equated with a downplaying of fascism that directly led to the rise of Hitler.

However, when one looks at recent events, in the US and Europe “Socialist” parties are always openly or clandestinely puppets of bourgeois interests. With Bernies betrayal and the DSA left backing war hawk and segregationist (not to mention creep and rapist) Biden in the US, it really does seem that Stalin and the Communists of the 20s and 30s were correct in their analysis.

So, is social fascism a correct take? Is reality more nuance

Hi, I’ve been very interested in the Comintern’s existence and it’s effect on the global Communist movement as well as how the movement had affected the Comintern.

(For TL;DR read the last paragraph, thanks)

In hindsight, it seems the supermajority of Leftists dismiss the theory of Social Fascism as too simplistic at best and actively harmful to the movement and helpful for fascism to grow at worst. After Hitler’s rise to power was consolidated, the Comintern did a 180 and advocated the theory of Popular Front, AKA ally with anyone who isn’t a fascist to take down fascism and restore bourgeois “democracy”.

Again, a large portion of leftists, though perhaps not a supermajority, also deride