Ehryk

https://preview.redd.it/w9yagcnampbd1.png?width=744&format=png&auto=webp&s=074282c699efd745dec74b7ce201d6bb1dc06ef4

All onions need to be criminalized.

I'm looking for starting settings to be able to boot my 5950X with 2000 MHz FCLK with a 128GB kit of DDR4-4000 RAM (CL18-22-22-42 1.40V) which has 16Gbit Hynix MJR ICs. Not ideal, but high capacity.

With the XMP Profile loaded, the RAM kit should be able to do 4000 MT/s as advertised, right? Or is this unreasonable to try to get a 5950X to drive for some reason? I realize the RAM isn't ideal for overclocking, but I am only looking to get it to run at it's tested XMP specification.

Where would I start to attempt this from auto/defaults for the 5950X, and the XMP profile on the RAM? I can get it to boot and run stably in 1800, 1833, 1867, but 2000 and 1900 would not boot and I stopped at 190

I'm looking to overclock my infinity fabric / memory speed to as high as I can and then adjust the timings and CPU afterward, but I'm not sure if I'm approaching this correctly. The purpose is mostly for learning and lulz.

I have a set of 4 x 32GB Trident Z Royal memory and a Gigabyte X570S motherboard. The XMP profile for the RAM is DDR4-4000 CL18-22-22-42 1.40V.

RAM: https://www.gskill.com/product/165/299/1601284845/F4-4000C18Q-128GTRS
Motherboard: https://www.gigabyte.com/Motherboard/X570S-AORUS-MASTER-rev-10#kf

However, I cannot boot with 4000

Does anyone know what the mating connector for this 7 pin connector is on this JR1930RX-2-24V ESC? I'm trying to adapt it into where I had a Weelye RX23-C1, and I'd like to wire it up to the mating end of this connector, ordered from something like digikey in case I need to replace the ESC again down the road.

https://preview.redd.it/pp9svxaiv00b1.png?width=1109&format=png&auto=webp&v=enabled&s=70ed40c8ce474a80794d4b27087d0cc81dd99bea

Product Link: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09ST9PQGZ

Some speculation has been made that the OR6A2 gene that causes cilantro to have a soapy/chemical taste may be related to onion hatred, has this been confirmed or studied anywhere? Or have any other genes been linked to hatred of onions?

Asking so I can send a link out to family members that keep slipping onions into food because "I'll never notice" or "I'll grow up some day".

These include:

• http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
• Dave Wood http://www.answeringmuslims.com/
• Raymond Ibrahim http://www.raymondibrahim.com/
• Bill Warner http://politicalislam.com/

Any time I bring sources of this nature (I.E. critical of Islam), they seem to get dismissed out of hand, even by non-muslims. Why?

All responses I have gotten commit this fallacy:

However, it is also a fallacious ad hominem argument to argue that a person presenting statements lacks authority and thus their arguments do not need to be considered. As appeals to a perceived lack of authority, these types of argument are fallacious for much the same reasons as an appeal to authority.

- http

Christian: anyone who believes that Jesus was the son of Yahweh, a god

Muslim: anyone who believes that Muhammad spoke to Allah, a god

Jew: anyone who believes in a god named Yahweh, who did not father Jesus nor communicate with Muhammad

Jihad: Whatever Muhammad said it was, or did and called it jihad in the Qur'an, Hadith, and Sira (as well as the next two generations for doctrinal reasons). In the broadest sense "fighting against the opponents of Islam" such as the non believers, kafir, apostates, not-true-muslims, etc.

Very often, especially when discussing Islam, this terminology seems to be deflected or just outright rejected, and I'm curious as to why.

Christian ex

Here is a lecture given by Dr. Bill Warner on Islamic history:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_Qpy0mXg8Y

How well does this line up with historical record?

Note: I have no interest in ad hominem arguments against him - only the content of the video and how well it does or does not align with historical record. Position within the video would be helpful if you are supporting/refuting a particular statement.

If you haven't heard of it, taqiyya is sometimes interpreted as permission to lie to non-believers or members of other religions/sects of Islam to defend yourself from harm.

The basic principle of taqiyya is agreed upon by Sunni scholars, though they tend to restrict it to dealing with non-Muslims and when under compulsion (ikrāh), while Shia jurists also allow it in interactions with Muslims and in all necessary matters

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taqiya

However, clearly some (at the very least, this one egyptian cleric) promote it as good and permissible to lie about the faith to convert people to Islam:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iVJEMD3GA3w

Is this something you have use