ExplicitAssignment

Hello everyone!

Some time ago I had a sweet woman who talked with me about her fantasies (and I about mine) and even played some erotic VN of her choice with me. I enjoyed it a lot but unfortunately it ended.

Due to being unattractive and having autistic traits I have been alone for essentially all my life which might have led to strange fetishes for me. If you were similar, it would be great - while it's great if you are hot, it would be even better if you are below average to ugly, then we could maybe bond better.

We don't need to have only compatible fetishes, but maybe we find something of mutual interest. We could talk about the porn we watch or read, exchange recommendations or mayb

So I wonder about the distinction between incel and volcel.

My personal opinion is that there are pretty much no heterosexual female incels, but then I also hear some incels claim that they wouldn't date someone they are not attracted to and still claim that they are incels which sounds contradictory to me.

So what do you think, what is the minimum quality of a relationship someone would need to be able to get so they are considered a volcel?

• Any type of relationship if they put in extreme effort (e.g. dating an elderly people and concentrating 100% of their effort on the relationship, ignoring all of their own desires)?
• A "normal", but abusive or toxic relationship?
• A relationship

I guess for quicker questions/more casual conversations it could make sense. Don't know if it's possible to add it to the sub, otherwise if a few people comment that they would like to join I could add all of you!

Recently I read a lot about how attraction is important for relationship - but not only in the sense of that person A only wants a relationship with person B if A is attracted to B, but also that this is a requirement for the person B, so that person B only wants to be in a relationship if person A is attracted to them.

This seems to be so ubiquitous that it must be normal, right?

And if that's the case, how common is it that person A might not be attracted to person B, but still want a relationship for other reasons (for example they love them or share so many interests etc.). If that is the case, will person A likely fake being attracted to person B so person B feels better and maybe wil

So I think most people can agree that most women can get some sort of sex if they want to.

But recently I thought that the definition of incel could be the lack of "romantic sex". And I wonder if we build a more restricted definition of incels which would be concerned with the lack of sex by a loving person who essentially wants to express their love to them in a physical way - would "Femcels" exist then? Or would they still not exist because (virtually) every woman could get someone who actually loves them even if that women does not love them back and thus might be alone?

I myself thought of it. Would I actually love e.g. an ugly, psychopathic person who is only concerned about her own n

For context, I am living in central Europe and willing to travel to other European countries where it's legal.

While I am not even sure whether I am autistic, I noticed a strong pattern that communicating with people who think they are autistic is easy while communicating with other people is hard and always causes misunderstandings. I have also heard that many clients and many sex workers are autistic. However, when I read through the ads I cannot find any mention of that - neither escorts claiming that they are autistic themselves nor that they specifically welcome autistic clients.

So is there any indication based on the ads and social media (which is pretty sparsely used here) that an

Don't get me wrong, I won't get in a relationship, but if I would, how much would I have to watch what I say/do to not give my girlfriend ammunition for the eventual break-up?

I think talking about any mental problems etc. is out of the question, and probably talking about problems in the career can simply cost the relationship, but is literally everything which makes you appear weak "forbidden" or can you show at least low-grade weakness like admitting that you were wrong at some point etc.?

I think I once read discussion about how providers should review clients ... well, it seems that at least in my local escort site I could see some "client reviews", even though they were just responses to reviews of providers.

Essentially, the client gave the provider a bad rating and complained about bad service, so the provider responded why the service was bad. It was a bit funny to read because the client complained he couldn't do doggy, to which the provider replied that the reason she didn't allow doggy was because his dick went soft and she was afraid the condom would fall off and also wrote that he should have listened to her instead of playing with his mobile phone ... and this cli

I have seen different opinions on that.

According to https://www.masterclass.com/articles/what-is-a-cult there are four characteristics shared commonly among cults: Authoritarian control, Extremist beliefs, Isolation from society and Veneration* of a single individual.

For authoritarian control, the biggest argument against it being a cult is that the members don't even know each other and thus have no way to enforce how to live the life outside the cult.

For extremist beliefs, blackpill incel communities obviously share a core set of beliefs, which are the beliefs of the blackpill community. Alternative views, such as redpil

I didn't think it would be so difficult, I just want two things:

• A real creampie, either because the producer/performer has said so and it's not obviously fake or because it looks really real, e.g. because you can see some cum dripping out of the dick afterwards and the producers/performers are not known to be fakers
• Kissing or cuddling or both afterwards

An example: https://www.reddit.com/r/ElitePornScenes/comments/mp2wvm/manuel_ferrara_cumming_inside_angela_white_is_one/

Usually it's either one or the other - Producers like SexArt often have creampies with kissing, b

When I first read that term, I thought it would be something like sex-lobbyist, but as I saw it mostly used in a derogatory manner for "hobbyist", I now assume it could be portmanteau of slob + hobbyist, but I haven't found any clear answer.

Does anybody know what the exact definition of "slobbyist" is and where the term originated from?

I am looking for games where the NSFW content is an integral part of the gameplay, i.e. the game wouldn't work without the NSFW content.

I don't want (a) visual novels (tbh. often not games), (b) games where you get sex scenes as "reward" and (c) games where you need to lose to see sex scenes and would also prefer not (d) games where lewd content is just "decoration" (like in Deep space waifu).

Instead, I think for example in Karryn's prison you have some integration, but I would like something which essentially removes most non-sexual aspects out of "combat" completely.