ForestyForest

I have always thought the logic of killing torrents based on share ratio alone is a bit "dumb" for a philosophy of sharing. If I see torrents with few seeders I would ideally let that stay alive for longer, even if share ratio is exceeded. For healthy, sought after, torrents then sure -> reach ratio and stop.

​

Current regime favors new content and then older content relatively quickly dies.

​

Is there a mechanism out there that prioritizes different?

Just got to give some praise to the netbird team and their product! Set up the reverse proxy recently and now I've got public sharing immich share links with blocking of non share link paths (achieved in an inner/private caddy). Now theyve added support for L4 proxy as well 😁

So I just wanted to share this incident I had on my self hosted setup. I run two PM servers (not cluster) where the server in question has the assigned role of being a NAS/SMB share. The setup was:

• Root fs on single SATA SSD (M.2 slot)
• Three SATA HDD (6TB each) arranged in ZFS RaidZ
• ZFS pool as mount point on unpriv Debian LXC
• LXC setup as a Samba server (bridge network setup)

So, after running this for a while I notice that SSH and GUI to PM Host is unresponsive.. but the samba share keeps chugging along and my Jellyfin serves linux iso's just fine! So I'm like, "I'll look into it later".

Later comes along I start by doing a hard-restart of the server (I can not shell to it and d

To migrate an existing installation, as an alternative to the guide in the docs, can I just do the following:

1. Backup

2. Fresh install

3. Restore

Will this strategy fail for some reason?

I have n8n self hosted and I have a browserless container. I have tried n8n-nodes-puppeteer but I have been hitting a wall with a OIDC/OAuth2 2FA login flow (iframes) where it is flaky and most times it fails to find selectors that it does find if I do the 2FA fast enough.

I'm thinking on switching to playwright but want to go with a tried and tested approach. Can I for example run playwright in code nodes where I "manually" connect to the browserless? Or should I go with a open-source community node?

Also, do you know of any browser-in-container solution that exposes sessions on HTTP(S) so I can make hybrid flows? A workflow initiates something and sends me a message with a link (plan on

Might it be possible with Caddy L4 plugin, which may support passing through TCP to Netbird? Has someone tried, should I try or is it not possible

I have a proxmox server but not much storage on it. I have now built another case (ITX, i5 cpu, 12Gb RAM, 3 drives 6tb each, only integrated gpu). Initally I thought, be simple, make this machine do one thing, be a TrueNas machine. But should I reconsider? The main issue is I couldnt run that many vms/containers anyway because the single ssd is limited in terms OS space.. its like 256 GB

I have a Proxmox server and a then a separate Lenovo PC installed with Debian which i use as media "center" connected to TV. This PC is overpowered to just browser to get jellyfin.. so why not double it as host for pbs? I think running pbs external to proxmox machine is a good idea. I read I could install pbs on top of debian, but that it was not a trivial task and came with warnings.. So how about a KVM VM? Good or bad route?

I currently have a single Proxmox server and going to build a NAS soon. I havent set up PBS yet and was wondering how the S3 storage works like. I was thinking of buying archive level S3

• Is there any limiting factors when using S3?
• I have internet upload of 500 mbit
• Future storage will be from 10TB to 20TB
• What compression level can I expect when data is audio, video and images?
• Run PBS on VPS or locally?

If I were to use some local external usb disks for backup storage, could I store backups to multiple usb drives, given the incremental/deduplicated type of data?

Tar gjerne imot. DM for info

I'm starting out and feel like this is a fork in the road, which way to approach hosting. I am familiar with docker, but I am intrigued by the lightway LXC approach. So what is your opinion? Which approach causes the most friction and difficulties?

Converted my old gaming PC into a server to be used for self hosting. Proxmox up and running. But I feel like I need some advice on storage and priorities if I'm going to buy upgrades. My disks now:

Disk 1: SATA SSD 250GB (Proxmox OS disk and lvm-thin partition)

Disk 2: HDD 1 TB

Disk 3: NVMe 2 TB

(Not installed, spare Disk 4: HDD 2 TB)

Future plan is to two-parts

1. Have a ZFS pool with 3-4 Disks (RAID-Z or ) to store various media that is not super critical if lost (data pulled from web)

2. A seperate NAS to hold hold my own and family private cloud storage, think Seafile or some storage solution with various client support (compute might be on proxmox). This I need to think serious

Some hardware facts:

• UniFi UX7 Router (has the public IP on WAN)
  • Two VLANS (Default and IoT)
  • Default covers the wired and WiFi for personal use
• I have a desktop machine set up with Proxmox VE 9.x
  • Wired through unmanaged switch to the Default VLAN
• HomeAssistant MiniPC wired to Default VLAN

I have been looking at the MediaStack project for inspiration, among others, and have come up with my version which I plan to implement:

• Ubuntu VM, on Proxmox, to host most of the media server
• Set up a VPN Client in router, Proton VPN, for outbound traffic
  • Therefore dropping Gluetun in media server
  • This way I can control on the highest level which traffic to send throug

Currently, we have a keycloak setup with existing realms and users. Due to a third party software which we are going to use we need to support LDAP (as they can only integrate that type of identity system). I have set up a 389 Directory Server with TLS and now I want to populate it with users from a realm in keycloak. So in this use case, keycloak is the source of truth, not the other way around. The user-federation capability of KC, does it support this kind of use-case? If I set the Edit Mode to WRITABLE?