GhostFish

Location: FL, USA

I'm inclined to say no, but I'm just looking for resources/clarification.

I bought a house over a year ago with help from a lender. A few months later I was in a minor car accident with no reported injuries and vehicle damages claimed against my insurer at under $1,000. Then the other driver was involved in another accident later that month and now she is trying to take my insurance company or me for everything possible.

I have to fill out an affidavit stating my real property. Does my home that I'm paying the mortgage on count?

My friend works in Florida, and today his employer is mandating that employees take part in an after work social event involving ice-skating. To make sure all the work for the day gets done, the employees are being required to give up their lunch hour during the day, but they are being allowed to order pizza (paid for by the employees) to eat at their desks. They are then expected to show up for this event, after work, and if they don't they've been told there will be "hell to pay".

This entire situation seems completely fucked to me. Is this at all legal? It seems like they are taking away employees unpaid personal time. And my friend doesn't even know how to ice-skate! He gets to stand ar

http://www.facebook.com/pages/7-11-excluded-Gary-Johnson-Lets-tell-them-why-its-a-big-deal/438429216203383

This seems absurd to me. I can understand them feeling excluded, but the fact of the matter is that Gary Johnson cups wouldn't be in high demand. How can you be a Libertarian and be upset with a private company for not wasting it's resources on such a silly thing?

I first want to clarify that I'm perfectly fine with anyone doing whatever they want to do as long as it doesn't bring demonstrable harm on anyone else. So if you're a member of the "T" culture or whatever, rock on and do what makes you happy because I can't for the life of me see how it's doing any harm to anyone else.

That said, I have to say that I am still a bit confounded by you and I'd like to understand you a bit better.

I simply don't understand how you can have any idea that you should have been or would be better off as a member of the other gender. I'm of the opinion that everyone should be free to dress and act how they want, and that for the most part what we perceive as mascu

I was looking at an algorithm for finding the closest point on a line to a test point, and while I understand the final algorithm and how and why it works I wanted to step through a proof of it so I might be able to better explain it to others. When I was stepping through the proof I worked out, I hit a snag at the end and quickly realized what needed to be done to fix the error - but I wasn't sure if there was a good explanation for the fix. The fix kind of makes sense intuitively, but I'm wondering if there is some specific rule that explains why it is necessary. Hopefully you'll be able to see what I mean.

First off, our given values:
A - First point on the line
B - Second point on t