Graphitii

I’m tired of being barraged with pop ups to use the official app. At least on desktop, I can just go to preferences and make old reddit default, but on mobile, I keep getting redirected to m.reddit.

HAO97-1HLR5-0VMSC

YAB8I-3G5V4-K8NB8

ZEP0T-TEWBL-32ECE

TJB4Y-5O2E7-1BPL5

TJUO6-O7GIO-YLR3Q

J2KUW-OBMQ8-AY0D7 has been taken.

EDIT: All taken. If anyone else with 5 codes posted here, that would be appreciated.

For one thing, the mobile site no longer looks as if it's from 2009.

For example, I often hear the claim that creationists arbitrarily define kind and macro evolution to be always beyond observable evolution. But what about the opposite?

What prevents us from defining species however we want and saying that the change is evolution?

What prevents us from defining evolution however we want?

Isn’t this hypocritical?

I am aware that evolution generally refers to change in alleles over time, and that we have numerous transitional forms that can be directly observed. I just wanted to get this question off my chest.

Think hell’s creek but with different methods. I’ve heard about genetic clocks agreeing with C14, and tree rings calibrating carbon dating.

The first, I cannot source. (I’m an idiot at search engines.) The second is often dealt with by creationists by claiming that it’s all circular reasoning.

At what point can you say, “Aha! Evolution can go no further!”?

The folks at r/debateevolution await your responses.

It’s basically Creationists explaining how the flood could supposedly have lain down all those layers instead of just one.

Link:

http://creation.mobi/noahs-flood-the-big-picture

Magnetic field? Junk DNA?

Besides, Tiktaalik, obviously.

In a previous email, Bruce has stated:

I am not interested in continuing the discussions with you any longer on these terms.

That was frustrating, but I respected it. Aside from begging him to use reddit, I’ve stopped messaging him.

So I was pleasantly surprised when I opened my inbox and found another message. Unfortunately, it was titled “Richard Dawkins Proves Intelligent Design in 5 Min.”

The message was,

Hi James,

https://youtu.be/prFZTMIKOi4

BB

Short, indeed. Before I clicked the link, I knew EXACTLY what it was. It’s Dawkin’s interview from the film Expelled no intelligence allowed.”

The problem with this particular quote mine is that I know it’s gonna be

I've sent Bruce some replies. To avoid cluttering up this sub, I've pasted them here: https://pastebin.com/M5jhwEUy

More replies:

No James, the problem begins with your inability to explain whether or not you believe that killing a man is the same as killing a dog. Lots of scientific blindness stems from moral blindness.

You say that the dice argument proves nothing without giving even the slightest reason. Note clearly too that I am not demanding that you agree with me. Not at all. But I do require you to answer my argument with a counter argument rather than mere baseless denial devoid of data or argument.

Your response is a classic Evolutionist’s response. It is nothing