Lindayz

Bonjour,

Je viens chercher un avis objectif parce que là, je suis à bout.

Depuis environ 2 ans, je m’entraîne sérieusement à la flûte. Pas “je gratouille pour le plaisir”, non : je parle d’un vrai projet de vie. J’ai une compétition bientôt, et le premier prix peut monter jusqu’à 7 millions d’euros. Donc forcément, je ne peux pas me permettre de jouer 20 minutes par-ci par-là comme un touriste.

Mon planning est simple : je joue de 10h à 17h, parfois jusqu’à 19h30-20h quand je sens que le souffle est bon. Et oui, je répète souvent le même rythme. C’est ce qu’on appelle travailler une boucle, la précision, le tempo, l’endurance mentale. Les gens ne comprennent pas que derrière chaque “t

https://manifold.markets/JasonMendoza2008/hantavirus-pandemic-in-2026-or-star

Will resolve tonight!

https://manifold.markets/JasonMendoza2008/atletico-madrid-vs-arsenal-wed-0429

Bonjour, j'ai vu que polymarket par exemple avait été interdit par l'ANJ. Est-ce toutefois légal d'aller sur d'autres sites qui n'ont pas été investigués par ANJ ? Comment cela fonctionne-t-il d'un point de vue légal ?

Is it possible?

I've been reading a lot because I'm genuinely curious but I'm not sure everything I understood is actually correct. I would really appreciate if someone could tell me if my understanding is correct. I'm not looking for "this part is correct and the way it actually works is ..." or "this can also work that way ...". I'm looking for "this part is actually not correct at all" if any. I hope it makes sense :)

First, public-key encryption. Even the "double encryption" (where I encrypt the message with YOUR public key, so you can decrypt, then with MY private key, so you know it's me) doesn't really do anything related to authentication. If I think it's you, and your public key, but it's actually

I've been reading a lot because I'm genuinely curious but I'm not sure everything I understood is actually correct. I would really appreciate if someone could tell me if my understanding is correct. I'm not looking for "this part is correct and the way it actually works is ..." or "this can also work that way ...". I'm looking for "this part is actually not correct at all" if any. I hope it makes sense :)

First, public-key encryption, even the "double encryption" (where I encrypt the message with YOUR public key so you can decrypt then with MY private key so you know it's me) doesn't really do anything related to authentication. If I think it's you, and your public key, but it's actually

In WPF data binding, when a view model implements INotifyPropertyChanged, WPF subscribes once to the object’s PropertyChanged event (if I understand that part correctly). Whenever any property changes, the view model raises PropertyChanged with that property’s name, and all bindings receive the event. Each binding then checks the name and only updates if it matches the property it is bound to. But there is still compute done to check the name (a if statement).

Why does WPF rely on this single-event model instead of having per-property change events (e.g., MyProperty1Changed, MyProperty2Changed), which would avoid unnecessary event handler calls? Wouldn’t multiple property-speci

I’ve been using C# for a while, but mostly for math-heavy applications where I didn’t touch much of what the language offers (maybe wrongly so!!). Recently, I started learning about LINQ (through a book that uses EF Core to demonstrate interpreted queries). To practice, I played around with some small SQLite databases. But I keep wondering things since everything I’ve learned so far seems possible without LINQ.

• For local queries, I could just use plain for loops or yield return to mimic deferred execution.
• For database queries, I could just write SQL directly with something like Microsoft.Data.Sqlite (or SQL Server, etc.) instead of EF Core interpreted queries.

So is LINQ just