Pleonastic

I'm trying to work out an argument with regard to (illegal) drug use. I'm wondering if there's something written on the topic of what a person is generally entitled given a universal healthcare system.

My thinking is that in a self-payer system, it's hard to argue against the potentially negative health consequences of illegal drug use, since you will pay for the consequences.

But in a universal healthcare system, it seems as if there's (an implicit?) social contract that says we all have a moral responsibility to be as little of a burden as we can possibly be, so as to ensure that those who suffer from issues they themselves are not the cause of, can be given the best possible treatment.

(Hello r/ask philosophy! I can't believe I haven't known about this sub for the ridiculous amount of time I've been on Reddit. This place sounds like an absolutely amazing concept. I have so many things I'd like to ask and talk about, it's like a dream come true. Sincere thanks from me to all of you who contribute by being a part of this community. I am really looking forward to future updates/rant).

My question is based on three examples, in addition to the traditional: I'm working on a thesis in rhetoric, where I'm presenting newer arguments made by the anti vaccination "movement" as a result of its being presented in social media.

A lot of the arguments are obvious fallacies and/or stra

Been som talk about this, recently, here in Norway, but I cannot find sources and I don't know enough about Swiss censorship and/or legal presidence enough to have an opinion.

(This is perhaps a reach, but I figure it must've been a topic within certain art criticism circles)

Working on an article regarding AI and deepfakes used to create pornograpic content of celebrities, and figured I'd include something of a historical overview of arguments used to oppose various technological advances and forms of art that might mislead the audience into thinking the depictions are based on reality.

My field is rhetoric, so my knowledge of art criticism is somewhat limited. So any help is most welcome.

Thanks for the attention!

Players asked me for tips on shows that might give them tips for improving tactics in combat. I recommended some YouTubers talking about various class strategies, but that didn't seem to have very much appeal - bit too much theory crafting, I think.

PCs are currently lvl 12. In fairness, I think they do ok in combat (say, if the critical role players were a 4/10, these guys are maybe 7/10). But I certainly appreciate the ambition and would love to be able to give some helpful advice.

Edit: party is sorcadin, monk/fighter/rogue, barb and bard