Queendrakumar

우선 전문은 나무위키에 올려진 글을 토대로 합니다.

재미삼아 해봤는데 같이 공유하고 싶어 올립니다.

질문 1:

정량질문 - 몇 명이 토론하고 있지?

답변 1:

이 토론에는 총 5명이 참여하고 있습니다:

이윤희 – 진행자

이재명 – 더불어민주당 후보

김문수 – 국민의힘 후보

권영국 – 민주노동당 후보

이준석 – 개혁신당 후보

후보자는 4명이고, 진행자까지 포함하면 5명이 토론에 참여하고 있습니다.

질문 2:

각 후보를 요약해 봐

답변 2:

1. 이재명 (더불어민주당)
기조 메시지: 노무현 정신 계승, "국민 중심 민주공화국" 강조

주요 주장:
사회 갈등의 원인은 양극화, 저성장
AI·기후산업 등 첨단 산업 육성 통한 성장 필요
내란 계엄 사태(윤석열 정권)를 강하게 비판하며 헌정질서 회복 강조
사회통합을 위해 대화와 타협, 갈등의 정치 탈피 필요
연금·의료 개혁에서 점진적 구조개혁 주장

방어 논리: 자신에 대한 부패 혐의는 정치적 조작이

그렇다고 합니다. 기분나쁜 것과는 별개로 불안요소는 없다고 보여지네요.

I think I generally have a good understanding of what capitalism is or how it functions. But I don't think I really understand what "capitalism" is in comparison to any other economic systems of the antiquities and medieval societies prior to capitalism.

Surely they had money and surely they had some system based on loaning and crediting assets and money. And utilizing these systems to function exchange of goods in markets and real estate.

So then, how is capitalism different from these ancient economic system? How is the modern sense of the word "capitalism" different from ancient or medieval systems?

TIA

I'm curious as to how PRC and people of PRC, specifically, view Yuan Shikai and Sun Yat-sen as they were the leaders of Chinese Nationalist Parties prior to Chiang Kai Shek. I'm not curious about how Chiang Kai Shek is viewed but the other two people: Yuan Shikai and Sun Yat-sen.

Since Mao Zedong's Communist Party fought the Nationalist Party and the current PRC is built based on Mao's party, are Yuan and Sun viewed negatively as the former leaders of the Nationalists? Or is PRC's criticism about Nationalist Party (KMT) only relevant with Chiang's leadership?

How are Yuan Shikai and Sun Yatsen viewed especially with regards to their leadership of the Chinese Nationalist Party?

When you see Chinese people in your country (student, business, tourist), do you feel a sense of closeness? Or do you think of them as "just another expat/immigrant/tourist"?

I don't want to get into politics, but I don't want to avoid it either. But I'm more curious about day-to-day personal feelings or identity as an individual.

There is a notion in Korea (which I don't know is correct or not) that Chinese diaspora around the world forms a giant business network and help each other. Is this true to a certain degree or is it completely false?

Thanks.

Do Danish Hygge, Swedish Fika and Finnish Hüvä have a shared history?

Or are they false cognates?

Mid central vowel /ə/ has a special name "schwa". Why does this particular sound get the special name? And why don't, for instance, close back unrounded vowel /ɯ/ or the open mid-front rounded vowel /ɛ/, for example, don't get the special name?

There was a colleague of mine that was naturalized US citizen but originally from Nigeria as an immigrant. Whenever she was identified as an "African American" in a colloquial sense, she always added that she didn't identify being an "African American" and preferred the term "Black" or "Black American" because "African American" has a very specific cultural and historical connotations that she is not a part of. I also heard a similar thing from a friend from Kenya who also had a very similar idea. While both of them respected African Americans, they didn't particularly identify with them.

Is such a view a common thing that's observed among African immigrants in the US, or are my friends uni

Seeing all the "Barbenheimer" memes and discussions everywhere on the English sides of online, I came to wondering. Is this a thing in your country?

It's not in Korea. Oppenheimer didn't even release yet, and Barbie is not doing too well without Oppenheimer, mostly because most Koreans don't relate too much with Barbie dolls so it never had the selling power to begin with.

What about your country? Does the phenomenon even exist? Is the meme popular? Which movie is more popular?

As far as I understand, linguistics is a descriptive science. However, prescriptivism runs the linguistic policies, as well as academic language arts in secondary education (as there are correct spelling, grammar, expressions), as well as foreign language-learning which are basically all prescriptive endeavor. So it appears that all society demands some level of prescriptivism. However, issues of "standard" or "correct" language oftentimes serve as hindrance to the natural process of language evolution, or protection of minority language/dialects and their relative cultural tradition.

What do you think is the "right" amount of prescriptivism, or does it even exist?