Respect38

p-zombies? illusions that your mind generates? conscious, yet the same as you? etc.

To me, the vertiginous question really gets at what makes closed individualism difficult to affirm as a dualist.

While I find the physicalist has an okay answer to this question, given their assumption that nobody has a soul, understanding "consciousness" differently from how I and other seem to mean and understand by it, I don't find that system to be very plausible against my subjectiv experience of the world, placed particularly in both space and time, when the physicalist account of human consciousness shoud be favoring no place and favoring no time either, as some argue. (if I understand correctly)

But I don't want to dismiss closed individualism intuitively without at least hearin

Several stages the game has have the same problem: in some matchups, one player can choose the stage with the intention of camping the opponent. There are two solutions to this. One, just ban every stage besides Dream Land (lame!). The better solution: allow these stages to be picked, but restricted -- if the player picks the stage, they are obliged to win the stage by stocks, not by time. Instantly, the cping player no longer can force the opponent to approach in an unfavorable position just by having a percent lead -- they hav to play the game until they take all their opponent's stocks.

This gives Hyrule and Congo serious contention for legality, as well as several other stages in the

Has a symmetrical underside, the stage hitbox ar intuitiv and actually match the visuals...

Not only shoud it, at worst, be treated like DL, or as FD/Omega stages (legal, but beïng struck with Battlefield) but it ought to be this game's primary triplat, being the most neutral of this game's triplat trio.

Assuming the Rockies ever have a competent FO, or if we ever get Salt Lake MLB, those teams would be notable for being much higher in elevation than the vast majority of the league. So how do they take advantage?

Some obvious things: your AAA affiliate probably should be high up in elevation. The Rockies get this right, tho their AA affiliate is in Hartford, at 30ft above sea level...

Batting? This shouldn't be your priority, since you play in a naturally hitter-friendly environment. Go after other areas of the game that your lineup can be good at. Baserunning should be valued more highly, no?

Fielding? Because effective pitching at altitude is harder than at sea level, I feel like this i

Discovered the goblin probably about a half a year ago now, occasionally keep up with his goings-on.

I don't believe I've ever heard the matter of his beliefs brought up, though. Do we know that he is, or claims to be?

Batting average is awful in such a count anyway, so the primary downside -- bunting it foul for an out -- doesn't seem all that serious anyway.

And if yes, what about 0-1 bunts and 1-2 bunts?

Because what matters the most about a fan's perspectiv of an event is how it ended, not how it was in the middle. And the target score end garantees that the most exciting portion of the game is the part that leaves the greatest impression, rather than letting the current limp finish of a free throw contest to close out games that arn't really close at the very end.

The pros greatly outweigh the cons for it, and at the very least it should be added to OT (no-brainer) if the league isn't willing to add it to regulation quite yet.

Whether that's 50+, 55+, 60+ [i.e. kicked from own territory], should we be rewarding special teams more for these impressiv long-distance kicks?

With the Elam Ending, has this been your experience? Or does the Elam Ending still live up to the hype even after watching many games with the setup?

If the call was entirely up to you, would the Elam Ending be scrapped?