ScoopDat

I tried looking at settings but couldn't find anything. Odd if this is the fact for a 1.0 release?

Was just curious as to why some USB-C cables are doing this. I was under the impression USB-C cables (especially of the modern era of 100W+ cables), have e-Marker chips recognizable regardless of orientation making this ordeal ridiculous?

I have a few that do this, but the one I primarily use is a Satechi 100W 10-inch cable.

Is this some cost-cutting measure, or is this a limitation of the KM003C tester itself (which I doubt)

One other tangential question I had. What's up with blank vendor ID's for e-Markers? Could have sworn Anker got in a fiasco once about using chips mean't for something else and that's why some of there cables blanked out the ve

Not looking to emitter mix or anything.

I'd like to imagine the company hasn't gone off the wall and completely abandoned Nichia 519a emitters recently until releasing this light, but would this be possible, or are they just offering 4000K to offer die-hard 519a users a single option without having to the legwork of managing multiple emitter SKU's that don't use their FFL emitters?

(I tried e-mailing since announcement and never got an answer)

I know there is a bug tracker for this, but I'm hoping someone has found some sort of solution for this staggering freeze-like behavior

It's been a problem for a couple years and was wondering does anyone do anything different to get around this other than partitioning everything into folders within folders?

There were instances where my mice in the past (consumer grade Logi's) would skip and whatnot in some buildings, but anytime I'd use it outside in a park or something, there weren't any issues.

I get it's convenient if you have Bluetooth as an option to also piggy back off the native 2.5Ghz available. But seeing as how all these gaming mice dongles are to be used very close to the mouse for best performance, I feel the marketing uplift you can get by advertising 5Ghz makes more sense than 8K polling and such nonsense. And it would be actually less susceptible to interference.

I presume no OEM offers such hardware for manufacturers to pick up off the shelf and put in their mice?

It looks like the Chinese trinity of 21700 tabless cells (BAK, EVE, and Ampace) are going to start having some competition from the mainstay monolith battery companies soon. Or this might just simply be Samsung's extremely late answer to the Molicell P45B or P50B (more probable).

I don't understand what's really going on at the moment, but this cell is rated at 4000 mAh according to the datasheet.

Or 4400 mAh according to the wrap of the battery, or 4500 mAh according to a few websites like IMR batteries.

Was wanting the new NOV-Mu V2S in a 6500K option, so I emailed support asking if it was possible to get the 351RD instead of the 351A options they had on the drop down options. But was told it wasn't possible. So now I'm left wondering is it due to some sizing issues, and if there is someone I could send the light off to, to have it emitter swapped?

Seeing as how they don't observably exhibit the typical intensity falloff of LED/incandescent lights - I assume they are affected by the Law in reality in some manner, but not for any relevant practical distances. Is this correct when concerned with the intensity falloff portion of the Law?