u/SeriousPuppet
In the exclusive right to sell there is specified a date when the listing is to go active. If the client does not sign the contract by this date (because let's say his laywer is reviewing it), then what? Does the broker need to re-send the contract again with new listing date?
About how much do you think I could have this built for in an average midwest city?
Its about the most simple (low cost) type of home to build yes?
I have never built a house before. But I have remodeled a few and rented them and sold a couple.
I would like to build a house and sell it. I guess you call that a spec house?
I already own the lot I'd like to build on. I want to start small; so less risk, while learning. Not worried about profit on first try. Just don't want to lose money.
Will a lender make me a construction loan based on the economics of the house (ie what they perceive to be the likelihood of me being able to sell the house at market value)? Or do they base it on other stuff?
Will it be a good thing that I'm starting small, since I haven't built before; will they view that as acceptable risk for them?
Thinking les
I knew it was cheap before. It went through a downturn, kinda like Detroit but less so.
But I thought it had recovered a lot.
But out of curiosity I checked, and wow. If you are looking for a cheap house... it looks like the best deal in the US, that is if you want to live in a major city.
(no I don't live in Cleveland, and never have. I just like browsing)
Eg, $110k for this. Not great per se, but not horrible. The neighborhood looks ok.
I mean, I didn't even think you could get prices this low still without it being a complete gut job.
Look at this cutie, [$125k](https://www.real
Someone left a trailer on my vacant lot. Like a trailer that you might haul a boat with. Seems to be functional but a bit rusty. Should I put it on craiglist for free if someone will pick it up? Not sure what else to do with it. I don't need it.
Possible someone left it temporarily and is coming back for it. Or they could have dumped it.
Just curious, do you think its easier for a team to win their respective country's league (Premier League, Serie A, LaLiga, etc) or easier to win one of the European league titles (Champions League, Europa, Conference)?
All of course are difficult.
In their country league, they have fewer teams (20) but play more games (38), as compared to the international tournaments where there are more teams (30-40 let's say), but fewer matches than league.
Just live within your means.
Rather than continuing to increase debt, you have to stop spending and live within your means. This seems like common sense to me.
I don't understand.
Ok, now we have to pay our bills. So lift it but only if there is a plan to not have to lift it again.
Now debt is too high. Too much interest.
Yes it's both sides that have spent too much.
But it has to stop at some point. I don't get why they don't just make a plan to not have to hit another debt ceiling. Why can't they make such plan?
Why doesn't everyone on the non-kicking team step way forward, like way way forward, to make everyone else clearly offside? What is the point in jostling with the opponents on their line as they position to receive the free kick and head it in? Seems this kind of offside would be much easier to draw than one in normal play where you are unsure when/if the pass will be made.
You know how there are all those old row type houses in Europe, in places like Italy, with the cobblestone lined paths. I think some of them were built before modern plumbing, say 400-ish years ago.
As far as water and sewerage, were those systems added to these homes after modern plumbing was invented? Or just never added? How did they do it? They dug up those old stone streets to install the waste pipes and water lines?
Just curious
Just my opinion of course.
To me, some languages that I find not-attractive sounding are: Dutch, Portuguese, Cantonese
Languages that I find attractive sounding: Italian, Japanese
Neutral on: English, Korean, Russian, French, Spanish
Do you feel it has any effect on playing? Positive or negative.
Some very elite players have (or had) long hair like Erling Haaland, Darwin Nunes, Sergio Ramos, Gareth Bale, Luka Modric.
Just wondering because my kid's hair is getting really long. Almost long enough to pull in a pony tail. I wanted him to cut it but he doesn't want to. Now that summer is approaching (it gets very hot here) will it make him feel extra hot? Also it's kind of a hassle to always remember head bands and sometimes I forget or can't find one and his hair hangs down over his eyes which I don't see how that could be good.
Some coaches play a 2-1-3 (two wingers). Some do a 2-3-1. Of course there are other formations but let's compare these two for this age group.
I have seen that if you put 3 up front (ie two wingers) it does not click mentally that they need to drop and help defend. But if you play 3 in the middle (ie two outside midfielders/wingbacks/etc) then they mentally will be in a zone where they are more understanding that the midfielder helps defend. Does this make sense? So it seems to me, since kids at this age are simple-minded tactically, that it's better to call them outside midfielders (left midfielder, right midfielder) and then that will set a mental context that they are to both defender an