as the post title suggests... ive got bunches of RAM I'm looking to offload as I need to make some dough for personal reasons.

feel free to make offers.

| ID | Brand | Capacity | Config | Type | Speed | Model Number |

|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

| **1** | SK Hynix | 8GB | 2Rx4 | Reg ECC | 1333 MT/s | HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 |

| **2** | SK Hynix | 8GB | 2Rx4 | Reg ECC | 1333 MT/s | HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 |

| **3** | SK Hynix | 8GB | 2Rx4 | Reg ECC | 1333 MT/s | HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 |

| **4** | SK Hynix | 8GB | 2Rx4 | Reg ECC | 1333 MT/s | HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 |

| **5** | SK Hynix | 4GB | 2Rx4 | Reg ECC | 1333 MT/s | HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 |

| **6** | SK Hynix | 4GB | 2Rx4 | Reg ECC |

Hey everyone, I’m currently staring at my server rack and a pile of loose 2.5" SSDs, and I’ve run into a bit of a wall. I really need to condense twelve 2.5" drives into my three open 5.25" bays. The "gold standard" seems to be the SilverStone FS212, but at the current market price, it costs more than the actual drives I'm trying to mount. My wallet just can't justify spending ~$100+ on a metal cage right now. Does anyone in the community have (or know of) a proven STL for a 3D-printed equivalent? I've poked around Printables and Thingiverse, but most of what I find is either for single 5.25" bays or lacks the density to hit 12 drives. What I'm looking for:

• Density: Ideally fits 12 drives

Hi everyone,

We all know the annoyance of using .local, dealing with CGNAT, or paying recurring fees for a .com just to route internal services. The next ICANN application round is opening soon (April 2026).

I am proposing we—the homelab community—pool our resources to buy the .homelab TLD legally and run it as a distributed Cooperative. No VC funding, no corporate ownership, just us.

I have sketched out the legal, financial, and technical framework below. This is not a "napkin idea"; it is a full spec. I want to see if there is enough interest to form a Steering Committee.

🏢 1. The Legal Structure: A UK Co-operative Society

We will incorporate as a **UK Registered Co-operative

​It started with a modest plan, a single, humble stack, "Twelve units is enough," I said, and bought a baby rack. I slotted in a switch, a UPS to guard the power, And felt the joy of self-hosting blossom like a flower. ​But Docker containers multiplied, and storage arrays grew, The bezels touched, the fans spun up, I’d filled the twelve-slot view. "I need some room to breathe," I thought, "Expansion is the track," So I sold the first and upgraded to a mid-sized, half-height rack. ​I sacrificed a weekend to the gods of hardware migration, Unscrewing rails and mounting ears with sweaty dedication. Another weekend followed for the cables in the back, I traced the CAT6 perfectly, no tangles and

Ok, so whenever I use team viewer to connect to my laptop. After maybe a minute or 2, it says that it's time and then when I try to restart the connection, it says that I need to buy a Licence which they charge 499 pounds a year, obviously as a free user. I shouldn't need a Licence and I'm not using it for commercial use. Although the prompt that they give me thinks that I am. Is there anybody that I can contact via email etcetera? To fix this for me?

Hey everyone,

Many of you in the distributed computing community might remember the old Collatz Conjecture BOINC project (sometimes called Collatz@Home) that aimed to verify numbers for the infamous $3n+1$ problem. For those who don't, here's a quick rundown:

The Original Collatz@Home: A Story of Betrayal

Back in the early 2010s, volunteers around the world dedicated their CPU cycles, electricity, and trust to what they believed was a noble scientific endeavor. The goal was to churn through massive numbers, searching for a counterexample to the Collatz Conjecture.

However, in 2014, a shocking discovery came to light: **the project administrator had secretly modified the software.

Hey everyone,

Many of you in the distributed computing community might remember the old Collatz Conjecture BOINC project (sometimes called Collatz@Home) that aimed to verify numbers for the infamous $3n+1$ problem. For those who don't, here's a quick rundown:

The Original Collatz@Home: A Story of Betrayal

Back in the early 2010s, volunteers around the world dedicated their CPU cycles, electricity, and trust to what they believed was a noble scientific endeavor. The goal was to churn through massive numbers, searching for a counterexample to the Collatz Conjecture.

However, in 2014, a shocking discovery came to light: **the project administrator had secretly modified the soft

Hey everyone,

Many of you in the distributed computing community might remember the old Collatz Conjecture BOINC project (sometimes called Collatz@Home) that aimed to verify numbers for the infamous $3n+1$ problem. For those who don't, here's a quick rundown:

The Original Collatz@Home: A Story of Betrayal

Back in the early 2010s, volunteers around the world dedicated their CPU cycles, electricity, and trust to what they believed was a noble scientific endeavor. The goal was to churn through massive numbers, searching for a counterexample to the Collatz Conjecture.

However, in 2014, a shocking discovery came to light: **the project administrator had secretly modified the software.

Highly Optimized Multi-GPU Collatz Conjecture Engine with Adaptive Auto-Tuning

TL;DR: I built a Collatz Conjecture checker with multi-GPU support, CUDA acceleration, CPU-only fallback, and adaptive auto-tuning. Achieves ~10 billion odd/s (20 billion effective/s) on a 6GB GPU. Open source with automated benchmarking suite for testing across different hardware configurations.

About the Project

I've been working on an optimized implementation for exploring the Collatz Conjecture. The engine supports:

• Multi-GPU Support - Automatically detects and utilizes all available GPUs
• GPU Hybrid Mode - Uses CUDA acceleration for maximum throughput (CuPy)
• CPU-Only Mode - Ru

Highly Optimized Multi-GPU Collatz Conjecture Engine with Adaptive Auto-Tuning

TL;DR: I built a Collatz Conjecture checker with multi-GPU support, CUDA acceleration, CPU-only fallback, and adaptive auto-tuning. Achieves ~10 billion odd/s (20 billion effective/s) on a 6GB GPU. Open source with automated benchmarking suite for testing across different hardware configurations.

About the Project

I've been working on an optimized implementation for exploring the Collatz Conjecture. The engine supports:

• Multi-GPU Support - Automatically detects and utilizes all available GPUs
• GPU Hybrid Mode - Uses CUDA acceleration for maximum throughput (CuPy)
• CPU-Only Mode - Ru

Body: Hi everyone, I'm hoping you can solve a movie mystery that's been driving me crazy. I have a very specific set of memories about a film, but I haven't been able to identify it. I'm pretty sure I saw it sometime between 2000 and 2020. The basic plot is about a male protagonist who ends up at a remote, hidden facility in a snowy location and is forced into a deadly situation. Here are all the details I can remember:

• The Protagonist: He's a skilled man. My first memory was that he was some kind of deep undercover or FBI agent, but a stronger memory is that he was captured or "taken" and forced into the situation against his will.
• The Ordeal: Inside the facility, he's forced to figh

So... I've been working on a a hefty project, a software package (purpose is a secret until completion), that can import data that's been saved from all different genealogy sites. it's a large project, and i needed sample data for testing. so I was on my gedmatch account, running through all the tools, saving tables to csv files using a browser extension, saving pages as html etc. and then all of a sudden on refresh, "Error 403

Our security system thinks you are a bot, or you are using software/scripts and your account has been disabled. Please contact our support team."

anyone else experienced similar before?