Don't get me wrong, there's other classes like the sorc that generated a lot of clutter as well. But with Warlock it is just at an entirely different level. It's at the point that I kick all warlocks from parties purely because I don't want to see their skill spam cluttering the screen. So, I apologize to the warlocks I've kicked already and the ones I'll kick in the future. And maybe if more of us start kicking warlocks out of parties simply for being warlocks, blizzard will finally fix that crap.
WorksInIT
u/WorksInIT
1st Circuit holds that the third country removal program is unlawful
ca1.uscourts.gov/sites/ca1/files/opnfiles/26-...Federal proposal would deeply cut Colorado River water for Arizona, California and Nevada
nbcnews.com/science/environment/proposal-cut-...
nbcnews.com5th Circuit Panel holds 2-1 that long term residents that are unadmitted migrants detained under 1225(b)(2) are entitled to bond hearings after 90 days
storage.courtlistener.com/pdf/2026/07/02/sosn...DC Circuit panel vacates 705 stay in expedited removal case - Make the Road v Mullin
media.cadc.uscourts.gov/opinions/docs/2026/06...Based on the dev stream, I think they are changing the way damage is calculated. I'm using the Maxroll site as the source for the current equation. Assuming you have 3 x20% damage multipliers, the current equation to get your increased damage multiplier works like this.
1.2 * 1.2 * 1.2 = 1.72
Assuming the damage number from the previous parts of the calculation is 1000, that means your damage before damage reduction is 1,728.
If you go to 0:47:36 of the dev stream, they say that multiplicative damage sources now stack additively. They said:
Damage multipliers stack additively with themselves but are multiplicative
So, I believe the new multiplicative damage calculation looks more like
California lawsuit temporarily halts Trump's crackdown on revoking CDL
calmatters.org/economy/2026/02/truck-drivers-...
calmatters.orgSeems like all of the polls are consistently finding disapproval of ICE, current tactics, and Trumps handling of immigration enforcement. His approval is in the toilet, in the low to mid 30s in all of those. But we've also seen polls from January 2026 that still show strong support for deporting illegal immigrants that have committed crimes and majority support for deporting all illegal immigrants. The Harvard Harris poll also includes questions on immigration enforcement that show a strong appetite for cooperation and strong enforcement of immigration laws
This poll was done between 1/27/26 and 1/28/26 of 2,000 registered voters.
Florida v Mayorkas consent decree bans Biden style parole policy for 15 years
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts....GOP, Democrats expect DHS shutdown after talks fizzle
thehill.com/homenews/senate/5725706-ice-cbp-r...
thehill.comSchumer says Democrats will bring up bill to extend health care tax credits for 3 years
cbsnews.com/news/schumer-senate-democrats-hea...I'm assuming since it is directly related to a case pending argument before the Court and whether that case is moot per the previous discussion on this topic, that this is okay to post outside of the lower court megathread.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.idd.45676/gov.uscourts.idd.45676.153.0_1.pdf
This was discussed several weeks ago. Link to that discussion is below.
https://www.reddit.com/r/supremecourt/comments/1n8rthl/plaintiff_in_little_v_hercox_case_abt_laws/
Basically, the Judge finds that it would be inappropriate for this case to be dismissed at this point and that there is a strong interest in getting final resolution. The relevant part of the opinion is
Pentagon calls up 200 National Guard troops after Trump Portland announcement
reuters.com/world/us/pentagon-calls-up-200-na...Immigration appeals court expands mandatory detention for millions
politico.com/news/2025/09/05/immigration-mand...No reasoning provided by the circuit court. But that means TPS for Nepal ended on August 6th. Honduras and Nicaragua end on September 8th.