XVOS

Hello, and thanks for your help on my last query about babywearing on the autism spectrum. I tried a Mei Dai as suggested, but I found it challenging to manage. It seems to me that a halfway option, such as the Oscha Cairis, could be a good middle ground, given the lower learning curve (other suggestions welcome). Looking at the Cairis, I noticed an XL option, and I am not sure I need one. There is another thread on this question, but it is from a woman who is probably differently shaped than I am (especially WRT height). I am trying to decide if I need to special order an XL or if I can use the regular version, and any experience or expertise is appreciated. I reached out to Oscha, and they

We are desperate and feel like we've tried everything (see list below), so we wanted to ask for help. Our newborn (~9 lbs) baby loves to be held, but we would love to be able to do things while holding the baby. In terms of the specific challenges we are facing, even without a crying baby, any sort of even semi-complex "origami" style option, such as a sollybaby wrap or option requiring precise zhuzhing (such as a ring sling), is super challenging. Wearing normal backpacks is okay (for some background), but super tight and plasticky feeling things, such as the Instagram ad "dad shirt" model with a pouch, were panic-inducing and constricting. Options that require complex and precise handwork

I feel compelled to share my experience with Samsung and warn others away from purchasing this monitor. Last year I bought a Neo G9 57” monitor directly from Samsung for $2,000. 14 months later, it suddenly wouldn’t turn on. Samsung said I was “out of warranty” and directed me to a “local repair partner” who offered to come by for a non-refundable $200 fee to evaluate the problem. They then told me they thought I needed a new $770 motherboard, which was also non-refundable (including if it did not fix my problem), I would then get a new “60-day warranty” (golly!), which would waive the consultation fee on any further problems over that period (I still would have to pay for parts), after whic

There are tons of these posts on this sub and most of the watches are fake (because, if you have to ask it’s probably fake). I think that we could and should expand or clarify rule 1 to include posts of suspected/potential fakes/counterfeits. Also, while many people here are smart I have multiple times seen would be ‘experts’ confidently asset watches that are almost certainly real are fake because they lack knowledge of brands‘ extensive back catalogues. The fact is that identifying good fakes vs. lower quality older watches from brands that have moved up-market (especially from the era before cnc machines) is actually somewhat hard. Even more so when going off of poor quality smartphone ph

Y2K was something that caused a massive freakout in the business world and the media, but it didn't turn out to be a particularly big deal in the real world. How did this panic happen? Who started and spread it? This is not a question about the mechanics of Y2K and why it didn't work, but more from someone who remembers being on Wall Street at the time and there being so much talk about "Y2K readiness" and what have you and making trades based upon Y2K, but it actually didn't really affect anything to the level of driving major financial or equity moves after the event.

This tactic is becoming more and more common and it makes the game significantly less enjoyable. You should either be allowed to undo your action with additional time after a snap (to act on the new info) or snaps done after a certain point of the timer should be penalized further and only take effect as if they were snapped a full turn later.

I own NHL network. I own ESPN+. Somehow because I’m traveling I cannot watch this game. Why is there no streaming option I don’t have to pay for when I OWN THE FUCKING CHANNEL?!

I just lost a game because my opponent got a 13 power wolfsbane off of leader. I ran all the numbers but didn’t understand this was how the card worked. I understand mechanically what is going on, but being punished for having priority feels absolutely terrible. It also feels counter to how the card should work. Personally, I think that leader can somewhat be played around (though maybe he should only work on one lane), what bothers me is that this aspect of the card cannot and feels against the spirit of how the game is supposed to work.