_dock_

Hi, I'm trying to find the partial pressure at which my reaction is balanced. Using Gibbs free energy I found that my compounds A + B -> C +D are balanced at C=1,9E-9 (this is Keq if I remember correctly). If I understand it correctly, if A, B and D are 1 mole then C needs to be at the Keq for no reaction to occur. If C were a gas, how would I find this? And is the only way to get this to a real-world application by just filling in some 'guessed' molarity for A,B and D?

I sometimes go cycling quite a distance while high and know people that go rollerscating, snowboarding or doing some regular scatting high. You do something a little active while on dope?

I don't even know where to start. No shit you can get a bigger board, my 2-year-old niece found that obvious. Why did you start your comment with "or"? Did the other person ever indicate that getting a bigger board is not an option? Did they suggest some other solution? If they never stated anything contradicting, why would you point out such an obvious fact under their comment with a leading "or" that has nothing to do with their comment? Should I comment "or maybe Russia should leave Ukraine" next?

OP has painfully obviously made a mistake on making the pieces too big for that board. Which is exactly what /u/ stated. Nothing more, nothing less. Yes, you can get a different board to fix th

Edit: thx for the responses!

So imagine I did a student T-test and got a statistical relevance of 0.001. For my experiment, I think the value is revelant for a P-value below 0.05. can I change my P value relevance to P<0.001 to show that it is even more accurate than with a higher P-value?

If it would be the other way around (P<0.001 --> P<0.05) it would be cheating the statistics I believe, as I didn't accept the results but want to use them. Is that also true in this case or do I just show that my experiment was far better than I initially expected?

Edit: thanks for all the replies! The conclusion I got: just show your P-value or lower significance levels if applicable.

maakte je net nou een r/programmeerdershumor grap 🧐? als frisse programmeur 🤓 snapte ik hem helemaal!! zelfs als ik mijn ene python🐍 course niet helemaal begrijp😪.. het was een hint naar het internetforum reddit 😎! hahaha😂🤣!! waar mensen grapjes maken over hoe zij ook altijd vastlopen tijdens het programeren 🖥️🖨️👨‍💻en dan hun leraar👨‍🏫 moeten vragen hoe ze het oplossen! helemaal🔘 herkenbaar voor mij 🙋🏼‍♂☺️☺️☺️😂🤣😂🤣😂😂😀😄😀😂🤣

Denying covid seems to make the pandemic take longer as people actively try to work against going back to normal. People are madly fighting against one another (figuratively). but do you see this in real life? Only as a consequence of people's online behavior. They have been influenced by Russian trolls who want the people to fight one another. Next thing we should do is have riots or civil wars, making countries weak and forcing them to defund the military. This opens all borders for Russian forces who can easily grab control

thoughts on this? I am not sure if this would be Russia or China or another force, but they must be the source of Qanon and the like conspiracies