Following the ongoing trial of Paul Flores, suspected of murdering his classmate Kristin Smart who went missing from Cal Poly in 1996. Coincidentally, Scott Peterson also went to school with Kristin and Paul. Like everything about Kristin's case, I am beyond frustrated with the decisions being made in the trial where Scott is concerned.
Why is the defense allowed to continuously name drop Scott Peterson, asking witnesses if they ever saw him around Kristin when there has never been evidence of any connection between them? It's clear this is an intentional exploitation of an unrelated, sensationalized murder. I hope the jury will see this but worry that the tactic will work to cast reasonabl




