cryptobrant

Hello,
I've had my machine for a year now and I am very satisfied, even though there are some small build quality issues.

As I am a very big coffee drinker, I can't afford to spend 20 euros on premium coffee every 3 days, so most of the time I just buy some big brands at the supermarket, no light roast, and I also avoid really bad brands... But it's industrial coffee beans, there is no roasting date on the package, and so on...

I find that all espressos my Ninja machine makes are very strong, which is fine for me - when it comes to excellent coffee it really is a pleasure to drink. When it comes to average blends, I can feel the burnt beans taste 10x more than with other machines. So

I read this sub since some months and I spend a lot of time testing on my side. I come with a simple question, because I am really not sure and I want honest opinions.

Do you think regime overfitting is actually the right way to go for prop challenges? I mean, fit hard on the current 20-40 day regime, accept the model is disposable, retrain when the regime flip, and that’s it. No ambition to build a monster system that work on every market condition since 2010.

Because the more I test, the more I have the impression that chasing a huge edge, stable on 10 years, robust on every regime, PBO under 0.5 and all the bells and whistles, is maybe just a waste of time for a 30-day challenge. A stra

Hi!

Why is my CQS showing as "lowest"?

8yrs old account, 60k+ organic karma, 46 trophies including 500 days streak. And I just discovered the existence of this new rating system after being unable to post a comment in a sub.

Maybe I'm not the most interesting person on Reddit but "lowest" seems unfair.

I have no idea how to fix that. Can't just get "more karma".

So I decided recently to jump and try the Max plan at least for one month because I'm one of the few users that really enjoy using Perplexity Pro and do so absolutely non stop to look for answers for pretty everything.

Let's start with the stuff that is not great since it's $200 bucks :

- No GPT pro searches/GPT deep searches

- No selection for thinking/reasoning Low-Medium-High-Extra high.

- Context is lower than on official apps. But I never had issues with that one.

- No coding app so it's can't 100% replace Claude Code or GPT Codex. But I understand this would be way too expensive.

- Labs is still a useless mess. This product shouldn't exist like this. They should either r

Hi, so yeah I noticed everyone's complaining about Gemini Pro getting "dumb" and this may be the reason I have to ask this question but I am looking for tips and tricks for vibe coding:

When I want to improve a code or change functions, 90% of the time Gemini will not break the code but literally completely regress my app or add things that I didn't ask for.

When I vibe code with Claude or GPT, the models are often incredibly careful at keeping everything in place (well, Claude is the best for this, GPT is hit or miss, but recently it's become super helpful).

Any instructions, any tips? Gemini is currently unusable for me and only good for basic web searches, but I already have Perplexi

Hello, New to Gemini as a core AI assistant. I find gems very powerful but EVERY single gem I have created has this bug: when I start a conversation with the gem, if I quit and come back I can't resume the conversation. It says "This conversation was created with a gem that has been deleted". And after a few minutes the conversation disappears from chat history. I can see it in the myactivity website and in the Gem history I can see it in the list but can't open it.

But the gems are not deleted and I can start new conversations that will get "orphaned".

I have created a dozen gems and each of them is a one shot conversation because of this issue.

I have tried logging off, creating new

Hier encore sur Facebook je regardais une vidéo d'accidents filmés par dashcam et l'une d'entre elles montrait un véhicule roulant sur la voie de droite d'un giratoire à 2 voies, qui se faisait percuter en quittant l'anneau par un véhicule sortant depuis la voie de gauche.

Environ 80% des commentaires reprochaient au conducteur circulant à droite de n'avoir pas respecté le code de la route et d'être fautif. Argument : quand on ne va pas à droite ou en face, on a obligation de se placer à gauche et de mettre son clignotant à gauche. Et je ne raconte pas les débats sur le sujet comme si c'était une dissertation de philosophie.

Sur ce groupe je vois aussi parfois des commentaires expliquan

En classe au collège, on entendait des bips qui venaient de nos montres à chaque fois qu'on passait une heure. Et puis la sonnerie de fin de cours derrière... Je sais pas si vous aviez ça aussi ?

Ca vient de me revenir, j'avais complètement oublié !

Hello,

C'est assez intéressant et je ne sais pas si ça a déjà été partagé ici. Une étude sérieuse ( https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/59/17/1203 ) menée auprès de 5205 coureurs via leurs données de montres connectées et sur quasiment 600000 sorties sur 18 mois a montré que sur les 1820 blessures de "surutilisation" auto-déclarées, 90% sont survenues subitement et sans signes annonciateurs.

Et surtout que le risque de blessure augmente nettement lorsqu’un coureur augmente sa distance lors d’une seule séance par rapport à sa sortie la plus longue des 30 jours précédents, avec des augmentations de risque de 64% (+10–30% par rapport à la sortie la plus longue des 30 derniers jours), 52% (+30–100%)