For those who AREN'T Ubiquiti SuperUsers, can somebody tell me what one is? :)

I'm curious if the reddit community is even aware. On the forum it's more expected/understood.

Not my video. From a friend.

Looks liked tracked AA. 12 missiles. Short-ish range. Huge radar aperture.

Any ideas what this is?

Video link

Thanks

Hi all, I've been chugging through quite a few forum posts, mailing lists, and juniper tech pub documentation and I simply can't find where I'm going wrong. Current topology: WAN<----- border router (MX) -----><----- core router (mx, ms-mpc-128) -----> transport routers/switches (ex) OSPF running between the border, core, and transport, ae interfaces between core and transport. Here's my current config:

set services nat pool thing1 address xx.yy.196.3/32 set services nat rule cgnat match-direction input set services nat rule cgnat term THINGTONAT1 from source-address 100.64.1.0/24 set services nat rule cgnat term THINGTONAT1 from destination-address 0.0.0.0/0 set services nat ru

Hi all,

I've been chugging through quite a few forum posts, mailing lists, and juniper tech pub documentation and I simply can't find where I'm going wrong.

Current topology:

WAN<----- border router (MX) -----><----- core router (mx, ms-mpc-128) -----> transport routers/switches (ex)

OSPF running between the border, core, and transport, ae interfaces between core and transport.

Here's my current config:

set services nat pool thing1 address xx.yy.196.3/32
set services nat rule cgnat match-direction input
set services nat rule cgnat term THINGTONAT1 from source-address 100.64.1.0/24
set services nat rule cgnat term THINGTONAT1 from

Does pfsense support acting as the end point for dhcp-relay yet? Basically, I can't seem to figure out how to provide DHCP responses for subnets pfsense isn't a member of.

Is this possible, or am I just missing it somewhere?

If it's not possible, does anyone out there have a solution? :) I need a "pretty/easy to use" web-ui for a dhcp server that can act as a dhcp-relay end point.

Thanks!

Am I the only one that has issues with this piece of crap?

You want to force me to use IE? Are you kidding me?! Right now I can't even log in, despite trying Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and IE. One the rare occasions when it does load it is TERRIBLY slow. It wouldn't surprise me if the webpage was served up off an arduino somewhere via xmodem.

Hey guys, I hope I'm in the right place here. I'm trying to move my Amazon Fire Phone (purchased unlocked) from Straight Talk to Ting. When I put the SIM in and boot the phone it's asking me for a PUK. I have the Ting card with the PUK... but it's not working :( Do I need to request a new SIM?

Here's the kicker though - I put it in my wife's phone who also is on ST (we both signed these phones up at the same time), and the Ting SIM works fine in her phone without issue. What gives?

Welp, this sucks donkey balls.

http://linux.slashdot.org/story/16/02/16/1724222/red-hat-google-disclose-severe-glibc-dns-vulnerability-patched-but-widespread

https://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.com/2016/02/cve-2015-7547-glibc-getaddrinfo-stack.html

bugreport: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18665

“The vulnerability relies on an oversized (2048+ bytes) UDP or TCP response, which is followed by another response that will overwrite the stack,” Serna said. “Our suggested mitigation is to limit the response (i.e., via DNSMasq or similar programs) sizes accepted by the DNS resolver locally as well as to ensure that DNS queries are sent only to DNS servers which limit the resp

I'm trying to figure out the best+scalable+cost effective solution for CGNAT/firewall in my environment. Right now I'm looking at using an MS-MPC-128, as it claims to handle about 60Gbps of overall service throughput. I can't find numbers on CGNAT/Firewall performance however, but I do have a lot of spare slots in an MX960 chassis.

I was also recommended using an SRX5600 (or similar), as it claims about 65Gbps of service throughput. I don't need most of the features though, and it doesn't seem like it would scale very well when we move up to 2x40Gbps feeds from our current 2x10Gbps feeds.

I'm leaning toward going with the MS-MPC-128, and adding additional ones as we grow.

Ideas? Anything

See title.

Is anybody out there running any MX480's on standard 120V outlets? Any problems with this setup?

Thanks

What have your experiences been with the Calix E7-2 platform and their CMS? Any hangups to watch out for?

I'm pouring through their engineering guide to make sure I'm squared away, but it's ~ 500 pages on top of other stuff I've got going on, so I'm trying to make sure I'm not missing anything.

Thanks in advance.