gsaura

Title, basically.

After everything Rockstar showed in the gameplay footage, if your reaction is to criticize what you saw, then there probably isn’t a single video game or any entertainment media that will ever make you happy.

This is pretty much the absolute peak of what gaming technology can offer right now, and it even goes beyond what many of us thought was technically possible.

Although it was already apparent that Mando & Grogu was going to have a weak box office performance, the second-weekend drop has been much worse than expected, and it indicates that Lucasfilm needs significant changes—changes that have actually been needed for quite some time.

After the box office failure of Solo and a film like TROS, which almost everyone agrees was a failure as a movie—a serious issue considering it was supposed to conclude the saga—the only measure Disney/Lucasfilm took was to stop releasing movies.

But they didn’t engage in any serious self-criticism. This led to a large number of TV series, with highly inconsistent quality but generally trending toward mediocrit

I’d like to know which of the two versions you would recommend, since I don’t own a PlayStation.

On one hand, I want the best graphics possible, so I should probably go for the Xbox one. On the other hand, I’m a big fan of physical editions and I’d really like to have a game like this on my shelf (even if it’s just a key card). I have a large collection of Switch games — and now Switch 2 games — on my shelf, and many of them are from the Final Fantasy series, so I’d like to keep that collection complete (with Final Fantasy XVI I had no choice but to settle for the digital Xbox version).

The handheld aspect matters less to me. I do like being able to play anywhere, sure, but for big games l

Let’s imagine a fictional state like “Deserta” or “Redstone” that includes: 1. Las Venturas (main city of vice and mafia) 2. Mesa Grande (rock formation area inspired by Monument Valley) 3. Dunewood (rural zone with ranches and armed conflicts) 4. Prosperity (mid-sized city with corporate hubs and residential neighborhoods) 5. Lake Amargo (faded tourist town with a lake and cheap casinos) 6. Black Mesa Site (restricted military/scientific area)

⸻

Why this fits Rockstar’s style: • RDR2 already proved that Rockstar excels at blending rural, desert, mountain, and urban regions in a single map. • GTA VI aims to recreate an entire state (Leonida), not just a single city. • Rockstar thr

It is more likely that GTA VII will focus solely on a single main city (like Las Venturas) and its surroundings, rather than covering both San Fierro and Las Venturas together. Here’s why: 1. Rockstar’s Philosophy: Quality over Quantity

Rockstar has consistently shown more interest in creating dense, detailed, and lively worlds than in covering many locations at once. Both GTA IV (focused on Liberty City) and GTA V (in Los Santos and surrounding areas) have demonstrated that their approach is to create a compact but deep and believable space, rather than a scattered map with multiple cities.

If GTA VII focuses solely on Las Venturas and its surroundings (deserts, small towns, mountains),

After watching The Acolyte, which I enjoyed but has its flaws, I came to the conclusion that Star Wars on TV works better as animation.

The Acolyte is just one of many live-action shows that shows the main problem of almost all of them:

1 - Although they spend lots of money, there are some moments where it looks cheap, and that happens in almost all LA series (Obi, Boba Fett, Mando S3, Ahsoka and Acolyte). With animation, spending much less money, you have Clone Wars season 7, Bad Batch or Tales of Empire quality.

2 - Most live-action shows are 6-8 chapters with 30 min length and they look like TV movies cut into 8 parts and the final product is messy. You dont get that sense in animation

I would pick Villeneuve as director of a new trilogy and Tony Gilroy as a writer. There are other great directors that could do very good movies like Nolan but I think Villeneuve is the best for the job after seeing Dune duology.

As a writer: Gilroy is the man. Andor is the best written Star Wars story since Empire Strikes Back.

They both would do a perfect trilogy.

I would cancel anything else, leaving just one show and this trilogy, because less is more and time has showed that too much content can take the magic away.

What do you think?

Would you like a game set in a smaller town with more enterable buildings and more details in general?

With such a game, maybe they wouldn’t take so long to make it.

Hear me out (sorry for my English),

Some people are saying the next GTA after VI will be set either in San Fierro or Las Venturas and surrounding areas and some people are saying maybe both, because those are the only cities from 3D universe left.

Others are saying that, with VI, they have the whole trilogy in HD and with VII they will start again with Liberty City.

Hell, some people think Rockstar will be able to do the GTA all cities by 2035 and I don’t think that will be possible by then.

The other day I was thinking about RDR 2 map and how it expands part of RDR 1 map and suddenly I got it clear.

Rockstar couldn’t truly honor the State of San Andreas in GTA V because of the limitati

Title. I read Thrawn trilogy but there’s no mandalorians in there. I read Legacy comics also and same thing.

What legends book covered Mandalore post ROTJ in Legends continuity?