oadephon

I have like 10 changes I need to make to a new UI. Most of them are small, and a couple are medium-sized and require some new logic and UI components. Normally I follow the plan -> revise -> implement workflow on anything medium sized, but I just get overwhelmed when I have so many changes to make.

Do you just give Claude the whole thing and hope for the best, even if it's going to take 500k tokens? Do you ask Claude to do like 2-3 plans and split up the work for other chats? Do you do 1-2 at a time until it's done? Is there some kind of agent workflow that would handle this problem, and still let me review plans?

Per Jonathan in the Ziz interview. You can always click "return to checkpoint" in a boss fight, and it'll take you out of the boss fight and not count as a death. There are no checkpoints in maps, so it'll take you to your portal room, and you can reenter the map (obviously resetting the boss HP).

Not sure how I feel about it. It's kind of a weird middle ground. It's good that players get more chances to practice a fight, but it kind of undermines the point of the "one death per fight" design. Why give players 6 attempts at a boss if they reset to checkpoint fast enough, but only 1 attempt if they die?

I really wanted to like this one. It's an exploration game based on getting collectibles, so it really should be just my sort of thing. But man, this game is so unbelievably tedious. You just have to traverse the same corridors over and over again, grab an upgrade or two, head back to base, then rinse and repeat.

And don't even get me started on the roaming mega-monsters that are pretty much designed to just waste your time. The worst was this time when I found an area with 3 upgrades. I had plenty of time to get all 3 and go back to base, but the squid spawned right in my path. I could've gone back to base with just two, but either way it meant I had to make the same slow trip back to this

How do you guys reason about a sentence like this?

Tenía el pelo muy rubio, las piernas bonitas y los ojos grises o azules; yo no había estado lo bastante cerca para comprobarlo.

Coming from English it makes sense to just say "bastante cerca" (I hadn't been close enough to check). What is the function of the lo in a sentence like this? Normally my shorthand for lo is "the thing," but it doesn't work in constructions like this.