onNet0

Since Novelism has lots of schools and practicioners different from each other it's probably open to very different outcomes after reform. I think for example an Ingsoc style British Novelist reform could have dogmatic, divine blood (to be the high god), stability and temporal. As the head of state and religion becomes the Big Brother himself. I wonder what are your ideas about different types of Novelist reforms?

I've always wondered about the specific origins of the differences between those titles. Shouldn't the concept of "ruler" be the same? How did the idea of something above that originate?

The early Christians were of Jewish origin. Do we know what happened to these people (or at least their descendants) after Christianity rose to prominence? Did they have important religious roles in Europe? Were they treated differently than gentile Christians?

So Oghuz Khan is said to have been an old Turkic ruler with a lot of legends about him. I've seen some people claim that he's based on Modu Chanyu of the Xiongnu. I've heard people identify him with the Islamic Zulqarnayn (Dhu al-Qarnayn). What are the things that we know for sure about him?

Are you in favour of somewhat regulating their power? Or are you ok with it because economic freedom is more important for you?