philantrophe

Dark Worlds is the one of most expensive decks available, even for a 62P + Box Sales player such as myself. It has interesting mechanics that make me want to build it — but I don’t want to dig into my current account’s scarce Gem supply to do so. Hence, I am wondering a Dark World World account is a good idea to use to play the deck, dedicated to putting all of its gems into Dark Worlders. Or is it a bad idea for one to do so.

Red-Eyes Balance was a fearsome counter trap deck that forced you to stretch your resources and play around Vigilance, such as activating soul exchange with no tributes in your hand. Wanted to build the deck before it got triple nerfed. Is there any post-nerf Red-Eyes Balance decks similar to how there is post-nerf CA decks?

Also PSA upgrade your glossy Red-Eyes to prismatic before Atticus (whose ace card is red eyes) comes if you’re the collector type.

Would the idea of primary and secondary skills be healthy for the game? Many skills are avoided just because there would be a better skill in its place, such as Power of Dark vs Destiny Draw. What if we had the option to to choose both. Destiny Draw would be a secondary ability and Power of Dark, a primary ability. Allowing skills that we’re previously unseen before to take the limelight. Though, some skills such as Grandpa’s Cards and Mind Scan can take up both slots.

We could run Blessing of the Cyber Angel with Balance, Jurassic World with Dino Destruction, LP Boost a and Restart; depending on what is counted as primary and secondary.

Primary would be skills such as Last Gamble, Beatd

Woodland Sprite allows for FTK with no interaction (Discount Lifeforce Harmonizer or Typhoon) It’s basically fills the role of what restructer revolution filled before. Though I may be wrong, since you do have to draw into it first before using. Unlike original Tea Burn that can function without drawing Restructor Revolution.