rrssh

The hero is then approached at his office by three emotionless and identically dark-suited agents, who travel in black sedans and move with sinister precision. These agents attempt to forcibly recruit the hero in their ongoing effort to draw out and hunt down a beleaguered and ethnically diverse underground resistance movement, whose leaders are advised by an oracular figure of questionable intent. At the end of their interrogation, these same agents implant a bug in the hero's body. Before long, the hero is swiftly removed from his modern existence and awakes to find himself in the 23rd century, wondering whether he has died and why he can barely function. Woah. And that's just the beginni

Puts partial blame on the victim. Gets accused of victim blaming. "This is not victim blaming"

"I didn't hire him of course, he has no driving license, how would he drive me." Word discrimination is mentioned. "HOW TF IS THIS DISCRIMINATION HE HAS NO LICENSE"

"Look at America something something" Whataboutism mentioned. "There's no whataboutism here"

You don't like the word, you find it dumb and people who use it dumb, that's fine. Express your opinion how you want. But those words mean these things and have always meant these things, don't make a statement that literally says otherwise.

Like come on, [the prohibited individual] is exactly a terrorist, that's what it's for!

Puts partial blame on the victim.
Gets accused of victim blaming.
"This is not victim blaming"

"I didn't hire him of course, he has no driving license, how would he drive me."
Word discrimination is mentioned.
"HOW TF IS THIS DISCRIMINATION HE HAS NO LICENSE"

"Look at America something something"
Whataboutism mentioned.
"There's no whataboutism here"

You don't like the word, you find it dumb and people who use it dumb, that's fine. But those words mean these things and always meant these things.

it’s 2019

The phrasex f@[&0 yis equivalent tof^:x y, but only if x is positive. Can anyone guess why?

https://blockchain.info/q/hashestowin

9.2x10^18 isn't even close to the actual 3.8x10^21.

Segwit is a soft fork, so old clients will be able to work with the same blockchain as new clients. So what was the point of making all these consensus bips if it’s all optional? Or the soft fork part is not true for the miners, meaning they won’t be able to make old blocks and get them accepted?

I understand that it’s precisely why 1 confirmation is insufficient, but is that how it works? There are two valid blockchains at the same time and it’s a matter of chance which one you’re on?

source

The Federal Law 406 prohibits republics of Russia from referring to their head of state as the President.
When the issue was brought up in 2015, Putin said he will respect Tatarstan’s decision to defy the law.