This targeting of 'Sanatana Dharma' is not some unintentional semantic misunderstanding, but a gradualist strategy of making Hindu concepts and practices controversial.
A perfectly innocent and good thing like thread and portraid it as controversial. (No, it is not restricted ot brahmins)
Here are some more examples:
The New York times had an oped saying the saari was extremist.
The Atlantic had an editorial making out Amar Chitra Katha comics as bigoted. This when they go out of their way and release comics which portray Jesus as divine etc. Whereas any literature directed to Christians or Islams portrays 'pagans' which includes H
